留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码
梁日深, 唐丰寿, 何浩斌, 汪健, 李江涛, 李清清, 陈轶之, 林蠡, 张凯. 西太平洋沿海石斑鱼属鱼类DNA条形码及分子系统进化研究[J]. 水生生物学报, 2021, 45(4): 851-860. DOI: 10.7541/2021.2020.080
引用本文: 梁日深, 唐丰寿, 何浩斌, 汪健, 李江涛, 李清清, 陈轶之, 林蠡, 张凯. 西太平洋沿海石斑鱼属鱼类DNA条形码及分子系统进化研究[J]. 水生生物学报, 2021, 45(4): 851-860. DOI: 10.7541/2021.2020.080
LIANG Ri-Shen, TANG Feng-Shou, HE Hao-Bin, WANG Jian, LI Jiang-Tao, LI Qing-Qing, CHEN Yi-Zhi, LIN Li, ZHANG Kai. DNA BARCODING AND MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS OF EPINEPHELUS SPECIES FROM WESTERN PACIFIC COASTAL AREAS[J]. ACTA HYDROBIOLOGICA SINICA, 2021, 45(4): 851-860. DOI: 10.7541/2021.2020.080
Citation: LIANG Ri-Shen, TANG Feng-Shou, HE Hao-Bin, WANG Jian, LI Jiang-Tao, LI Qing-Qing, CHEN Yi-Zhi, LIN Li, ZHANG Kai. DNA BARCODING AND MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS OF EPINEPHELUS SPECIES FROM WESTERN PACIFIC COASTAL AREAS[J]. ACTA HYDROBIOLOGICA SINICA, 2021, 45(4): 851-860. DOI: 10.7541/2021.2020.080

西太平洋沿海石斑鱼属鱼类DNA条形码及分子系统进化研究

DNA BARCODING AND MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS OF EPINEPHELUS SPECIES FROM WESTERN PACIFIC COASTAL AREAS

  • 摘要: 研究测定了分布于西太平洋沿海的35种石斑鱼属鱼类共142个个体线粒体基因COⅠ及核基因TMO-4C4标记序列, 基于最大似然法与贝叶斯法构建分析了石斑鱼类分子系统进化关系。同时, 探讨了COⅠ基因作为DNA条形码在石斑鱼属鱼类物种鉴定中的有效性问题。结果显示: 35种石斑鱼属鱼类COⅠ同源序列为636 bp, 编码212个氨基酸, TMO-4C4同源序列为486 bp, 编码162个氨基酸, 在COⅠ基因中, 种间遗传距离在0.030—0.202, 平均遗传距离为0.143, 物种间遗传距离均大于Hebert 推荐的物种鉴定最小种间遗传距离0.020(2%)。种内遗传距离0.000—0.008, 平均遗传距离为0.003, 种间平均遗传距离是种内平均遗传距离的48倍, 显著大于种内平均遗传距离, 表明COⅠ基因可作为石斑鱼属物种鉴定的有效条形码基因。基于COⅠ及TMO-4C4构建的系统进化树上, 35种石斑鱼主要形成2个主要类群, 类群Ⅰ由细点石斑鱼(Epinephelus cyanopodus)和蓝棕石斑鱼(Epinephelus multinotatus)等22种石斑鱼聚成, 类群Ⅱ由吊桥石斑鱼(Epinephelus morrhua)和小点石斑鱼(Epinephelus epistictus)等13种石斑鱼组成。部分存在同种异名争议的种类如云纹石斑鱼(Epinephelus moara)/褐石斑鱼(Epinephelus bruneus)和斜带石斑鱼(Epinephelus coioides)/马拉巴石斑鱼(Epinephelus malabaricus)经COⅠ及TMO-4C4序列差异及进化分析, 均存在较大的遗传分化。结果支持近期的分类研究, 云纹石斑鱼/褐石斑鱼和斜带石斑鱼/马拉巴石斑鱼均为独立的物种, 并非同种异名的分类。

     

    Abstract: To analyze the molecular systematic and phylogenetic relationships of Epinephelus fish, mitochondrial COⅠ and nuclear TMO-4C4 gene sequences from 142 samples of 35 Epinephelus species collected from Western Pacific coastal areas were determined. Inter-species and intra-species genetic distances were calculated using MEGA 7.0 and the molecular phylogenetic trees were constructed using maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference methods. The availability of using COⅠ sequences as DNA barcodes to identify Epinephelus species were also investigated. The results showed that the homologous COⅠ sequences of 35 species were 739 bp, encoding 243 amino acids and the homologous TMO-4C4 sequences were 486 bp, encoding 162 amino acids. In the COⅠ gene sequences, the inter-species genetic distances among 35 groupers were between 0.030—0.202 and the average distance was 0.143, which was greater than the minimum species identification value 0.200 suggested by Hebert. The genetic distances of intra-species were between 0.000—0.008, with an average of 0.003. The average inter-species value (0.143) was 48 times larger than that of intra-species one (0.003), indicating that COⅠ may be used as an effective barcode gene for accurate identification in Epinephelus species. In the molecular phylogenetic trees constructed by COⅠ and TMO-4C4 sequences, 35 Epinephelus species formed two major clades. Clade Ⅰ comprised of 22 species including Epinephelus cyanopodus, Epinephelus multinotatus, etc; Clade Ⅱ comprised of 13 species including Epinephelus morrhua, Epinephelus epistictus etc. Certain pairs of groupers like E. cyanopodus/E. multinotatus, E. morrhua/E. epistictus, Epinephelus bilobatus/Epinephelus maculates, Epinephelus coeruleopunctatus/Epinephelus corallicola, Epinephelus moara/Epinephelus bruneus, Epinephelus coioides/Epinephelus malabaricus were tightly clustered into sister species with high support values in the phylogenetic tree. Basing on the sequence divergences and phylogenetic analyses of the COⅠ and TMO-4C4 gene, great genetic differences were found between the species: E. moara/E. bruneus and E. coioides/E. malabaricus which were confronted with synonymous controversies. This results supported the viewpoints of recent morphological studies that E. moara/E. bruneus and E. coioides/E. malabaricus weredistinct species and should not be placed as synonym. This study provides molecular evidence to clarify the classificational controversy and to accurately identify Epinephelus species.

     

/

返回文章
返回