淡水排放对杭州湾湿地浮游动物群落分布的影响
INFLUENCE OF FRESHWATER DISCHARGE ON ZOOPLANKT COMMUNITY DISTRIBUTION IN THE MUDFLAT WETLANDS OF THE HANGZHOU BAY
-
摘要: 于2010年4月至2011年1月对杭州湾南岸滩涂湿地5个断面(S1-S3为排水区, S4-S5为非排水区)的高潮位和中潮位分别进行浮游动物群落结构的周年调查, 共发现浮游动物38种(轮虫15种, 枝角类4种, 桡足类19种)。排水区浮游动物年平均密度88.89 ind./L, 生物量0.41 mg/L, 非排水区平均密度仅4.21 ind./L, 生物量0.10 mg/L。排水区轮虫和桡足类的第一优势种分别为萼花臂尾轮虫(Brachionus calyciflorus)和汤匙华哲水蚤(Sinocalanus dorrii), 而非排水区第一优势种为中华哲水蚤(Calanus sinicus)。S2-S3断面中潮位的水体营养盐浓度、浮游动物密度和生物量均明显大于高潮位。淡水排放、潮沟径流和潮汐决定了滩涂湿地群落的时空格局, 后两者还解释了排水区中、高潮位间群落结构组成的差异。Abstract: In order to understand the spatiotemporal distribution of zooplankton species composition, abundance and biodiversity in the mudflat wetlands of Hangzhou Bay, 40 samples were conducted at middle to high tide levels in five sampling stations (S1-S3 for discharge area, and S4-S5 for non-discharge area) in April (spring), July (summer), October (autumn), 2010 and January (winter), 2011. A total of 38 species of zooplankton (15 Rotifera, 4 Cladocera, 19 Copepoda) were found. The annual average density (88.89 ind./L) and biomass (0.41 mg/L) of zooplankton in the discharge area were much higher than those, i.e., 4.21 ind./L and 0.10 mg/L, respectively, in the non-discharge area. The dominant species of rotifers and copepods in the discharge area were Brachionus calyciflorus and Sinocalanus dorrii, respectively, and Calanus sinicus dominated copepods in the non-discharge area. Water nutrient concentrations, community density, and biomass of the zooplankton at middle tide level in stations S2-S3 were much higher than those at high tide level. The zooplankton community in the mudflat wetlands, the effects of the freshwater discharge, tidal creek spread, and tidal conditions determined the temporal pattern of the main zooplankton species, and the tidal creek spread and tidal conditions explained differences in composition and structure between the middle and the high tide level.
-
Keywords:
- Hangzhou Bay /
- Freshwater discharge /
- Tidal creek /
- Mudflat wetlands /
- Zooplankton /
- Distribution
-
-
[1] Wang M Z. Environment and shellfish culturing in shoals along the southern coast of Hangzhou Bay[J]. Rural Eco-Environmen, 2005, 21(4): 33-37[王美珍. 杭州湾南岸滩涂环境状况及与贝类养殖的关系. 农村生态环境, 2005, 21(4): 33-37]
[2] Zhang S Y, Shao J B, Dai X J. Studies on eutrophication and phytoplankton diversity in Hangzhou Bay[J]. Journal of Fisheries of China, 2001, 25(6): 512-517[章守宇, 邵君波, 戴小杰. 杭州湾富营养化及浮游植物多样性问题的探讨. 水产学报, 2001, 25(6): 512-517]
[3] Song X K, Liu A Y, Ma Y Q, et al. Study on the plankton community in the sea area of Dongying in dry season[J]. Transactions of Oceanology and Limnology, 2010, 32(1): 95-102[宋秀凯, 刘爱英, 马元庆, 等. 东营近海枯水期浮游生物群落特征研究. 海洋湖沼通报, 2010, 32(1): 95-102]
[4] Lan W L, Peng X Y. Eutrophication status and its impact on phytoplankton biomass in the Maowei Sea[J]. Journal of Guangxi Academy of Sciences, 2011, 27(2): 109-112, 116[蓝文陆, 彭小燕. 茅尾海富营养化程度及其对浮游植物生物量的影响. 广西科学院学报, 2011, 27(2): 109-112, 116]
[5] Mialet B, Gouzou J, Azmar F, et al. Response of zooplankton to improving water quality in the Scheldt estuary (Belgium)[J]. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2011, 93: 47-57
[6] Peng J H, Zheng J X, Ma P M, et al. Comparison of planktonic crustaceans in north and south branches at Yangtze River estuary and impact prediction of South-to-North Water Transfer Project[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2008, 27(11):1948-1954[彭建华, 郑金秀, 马沛明, 等. 长江口南北支浮游甲壳动物的比较及南水北调工程影响预测. 生态学杂志, 2008, 27(11): 1948-1954]
[7] Badosa A, Boix D, Brucet S, et al. Nutrients and zooplankton composition and dynamics in relation to the hydrological pattern in a confined Mediterranean salt marsh (NE Iberian Peninsula)[J]. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2006, 66: 513-522
[8] Frisch D, Moreno-Ostos E, Green A J. Species richness and distribution of copepods and cladocerans and their relation to hydroperiod and other environmental variables in Do?ana, south-west Spain[J]. Hydrobiologia, 2006, 556: 327-340
[9] Medeiros A M A, Barbosa J E L, Medeiros P R, et al. Salinity and freshwater discharge determine rotifer distribution at the Mossor River Estuary (Semiarid Region of Brazil)[J]. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 2010, 70(3): 551-557
[10] Nour El-din N M, Al-khayat J A. Impact of industrial discharges on the zooplankton community in the Messaieed Industrial, Area, Qatar (Persian Gulf)[J]. International Journal Environment Studies, 2001, 58: 173-184
[11] Uriarte I, Villate F. Differences in the abundance and distribution of copepods in two estuaries of the Basque coast (Bay of Biscay) in relation to pollution[J]. Journal of plankton Research, 2005, 27(9): 863-874
[12] Li Q, An C G, Ma Q, et al. Species composition and diversity of zooplankton in tidal creeks of the Chongming Dongtan intertidal flat[J]. Biodiversity Science, 2010, 18(1): 67-75[李强, 安传光, 马强, 等. 崇明东滩潮间带潮沟浮游动物的种类组成及多样性. 生物多样性, 2010, 18(1): 67-75]
[13] Zhang Z S, Huang X F. Methods for Study on Freshwater Plankton[M]. Beijing: Science Press. 1991, 358-371[章宗涉, 黄祥飞. 淡水浮游生物研究方法. 北京: 科学出版社. 1991, 358-371]
[14] Wang J J. Fauna Sinica of Chinese Freshwater Rotifera[M]. Beijing: Science Press. 1961, 69-254[王家楫. 中国淡水轮虫志. 北京: 科学出版社. 1961, 69-254]
[15] Huang X F. Application of the simplified method of weight determination to various species of planktonic rotifers in Lake Donghu, Wuhan[J]. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica, 1981, 7(3): 409-416[黄祥飞. 简易测重法在武汉东湖轮虫常见种中的应用. 水生生物学集刊, 1981, 7(3): 409-416]
[16] Jiang X Z, Du N S. Fauna Sinica, Crustacea, Freshwater Cladoceran[M]. Beijing: Science Press. 1979, 86-171[蒋燮治, 堵南山. 中国动物志(淡水枝角类). 北京: 科学出版社.1979, 86-171]
[17] Fauna Editorial Committee, Academia Sinica. Fauna Sinica, Crustacea, Freshwater Copepoda[M]. Beijing: Science Press. 1979, 60-420[中国科学院动物研究所甲壳动物研究组编. 中国动物志(淡水桡足类). 北京: 科学出版社. 1979, 60-420]
[18] Zhang W C, Zhao N, Tao Z C, et al. An illustrated Guide to Marine Planktonic Copepods in China Seas[M]. Beijing: Science Press. 2010, 1-463[张武昌, 赵 楠, 陶振铖, 等. 中国海浮游桡足类图谱. 北京: 科学出版社. 2010, 1-463]
[19] Huang X F, Hu C Y. Length-weight equation of various species of freshwater Cladocera[A]. In: Academic Theses Editorial Committee, Crustacea (Eds.), Crustacea academic theses (The first series)[C]. Beijing: Science Press. 1986, 147-157[黄祥飞, 胡春英. 淡水常见枝角类体长-体重回归方程式. 甲壳动物学论文(第一辑). 北京: 科学出版社. 1986, 147-157]
[20] Chen X M. Biomass calculation of freshwater copepods[J]. Acta Hydrobiogica Sinica, 1981, 7(3): 397-408[陈雪梅. 淡水桡足类生物量的测算. 水生生物学集刊, 1981, 7(3): 397-408]
[21] Tang Q Y, Feng M G. DPS Data Processing System-Experimental Design, Statistical Analysis and Data Mining[M]. Beijing: Science Press. 2007, 59-636[唐启义, 冯明光. DPS数据处理系统-实验设计、统计分析及数据挖掘. 北京: 科学出版社. 2007, 59-636]
[22] Beusekom J E E, Weigelt-Krenz S, Martens P. Long-term variability of winter nitrate concentrations in the Northern Wadden Sea driven by freshwater discharge, decreasing riverine loads and denitrification[J]. Helgoland Marine Research, 2008, 62: 49-57
[23] Jia X H, Zhang H, Jiang K Y, et al. Seasonal changes of fish species composition and diversity in mudflat wetlands of Hangzhou Bay[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2010, 21(12): 3248-3254[贾兴焕, 张衡, 蒋科毅, 等. 杭州湾滩涂湿地鱼类种类组成和多样性季节变化. 应用生态学报, 2010, 21(12): 3248-3254]
[24] Li Q, An C G, Xu L L, et al. Quantitative analysis of distribution and variations of zooplankton in tidal creeks of Chongming island[J]. Oceanologia et Limnologia Sinica, 2010, 41(2): 214-222[李强, 安传光, 徐霖林, 等. 崇明东滩潮沟浮游动物数量分布与变动. 海洋与湖沼, 2010, 41(2): 214-222]
[25] Milstein A, Valdenberg A, Harpaz S. Fish larvae: zooplankton relationships in microcosm simulations of earthen nursery ponds. II. Brackish water system[J]. Aquaculture International, 2006, 14: 431-442.
[26] Michael E S, Gregory S P, Anett S T, et al. Hydrology and nutrient effects on food-web structure in the Lake Superior Coastal Wetlands[J]. Wetlands, 2006, 26(4): 951-964
[27] Lehman P W, Mayr S, Mecum L, et al. The freshwater tidal wetland Liberty Island, CA was both a source and sink of inorganic and organic material to the San Francisco Estuary[J]. Aquatic Ecology, 2010, 44: 359-372
[28] James N H, Simon M M, Tsuyoshi-Kobayashi, et al. Responses of estuarine bacterioplankton, phytoplankton and zooplankton to dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and inorganic nutrient additions[J]. Estuaries and Coasts, 2010, 33: 78-91
-
期刊类型引用(6)
1. 解成杰，谢湉，宁中华，崔保山. 黄河三角洲潮沟浮游生物群落结构特征及其影响因素. 湿地科学. 2024(05): 769-780 . 
百度学术
2. 李共国，史红伟，徐智焕. 象山港电厂温排水影响夏季河口桡足类群落结构的通径分析. 海洋环境科学. 2017(05): 706-711 . 百度学术
3. 李共国，屠霄霞，王佩儿，徐智焕，杨季芳，徐杭英，黄艺. 杭州湾滩涂河口桡足类群落丰度和生物量与水质参数的通径分析. 湿地科学. 2017(06): 766-773 . 百度学术
4. 王林，李冰，余家辉，朱加宾，朱健. 不同湿地模型净水效果与基质酶活性相关性的比较研究. 水生生物学报. 2017(03): 692-699 . 本站查看
5. 陈本亮，王晶晶，郭燕华. 我国湿地水生生物资源现状及养护措施分析. 南方农业. 2015(06): 136-137+139 . 百度学术
6. 秦海明，汤臣栋，马强，陈家宽，吴纪华. 春、秋季崇明东滩盐沼潮沟大型浮游动物群落分布. 水生生物学报. 2014(02): 375-381 . 本站查看
其他类型引用(1)
计量
- 文章访问数: 1212
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 680
- 被引次数: 7
下载: