CROP-WETLAND: A KIND OF CONSTRUCTED WETLAND OWNING MULTI-FUNCTIONS
-
摘要:
作物湿地是一种融合人工湿地与农业生产的复合生态系统, 通过充分利用湿地的水文特性和生物净化功能, 在污水处理与作物生长之间实现了优化平衡, 从而缓解传统农业对生态环境的压力, 推动农业与环境的可持续发展。研究系统分析了相关文献, 对作物湿地的植被类型、设计方式及污染物去除效率进行了深入探讨。结果显示, 水稻是作物湿地中最常见的植物, 而湿地类型主要表面流(51.9%)、水平流(33.3%)和浮岛(11.1%)设计, 垂直流的应用较少(3.7%)。作物湿地在水质净化、养分回收、综合农业等方面展现出多重功能, 更适用于低浓度污水的处理, 其处理性能与传统表面流相当。尤其在营养元素回收利用和农业综合发展方面, 作物湿地具有更显著的优势。未来研究应进一步优化作物湿地的设计与管理, 重点关注病原微生物、新污染物和重金属等潜在风险, 确保食品安全和环境健康, 从而更好地实现农业与生态系统的协调发展。
Abstract:Crop wetlands represent an integrated ecological system that combines the principles of constructed wetlands with agricultural production. By leveraging the hydrological characteristics and bioremediation functions of wetlands, crop wetlands achieve an optimized balance between wastewater treatment and crop growth. This approach mitigates the environmental pressures associated with traditional agriculture, thereby promoting sustainable development in agriculture and environmental management. This study systematically analyzed related publications, focusing on vegetation types, wetland configurations, and pollutant removal efficiencies in crop wetlands. The results indicate that paddy field is the most commonly crop wetland while rice is the largely cultivated in such systems. The predominant wetland configuration includes surface flow (51.9%), horizontal flow (33.3%), and floating treatment (11.1%), with vertical flow being less frequently employed (3.7%). Crop wetlands exhibit multiple functionalities, including water quality improvement, nutrient recovery, and integrated agricultural benefits. They are particularly suitable for treating low-concentration wastewater and perform comparably to traditional surface flow constructed wetlands. Notably, crop wetlands demonstrate a significant advantage in nutrient recycling while exhibit the development of integrated agricultural systems. Future research should focus on optimizing the design and management of crop wetlands, with particular emphasis on addressing the potential risks posed by pathogenic microorganisms emerging pollutants and heavy metal. Ensuring food safety and environmental health will be critical to achieving harmonious development between agriculture and ecosystems.
-
Keywords:
- Constructed wetlands /
- Paddy /
- Crops /
- Nitrogen and phosphorus /
- Resource recovery
-
-
![]()
图 1 作物湿地
a. 植物类型; b. 湿地类型; c. 水质类型
Figure 1. Crop wetlands
a. Plant/crop types; b. Types of wetlands; c. Type of water in crop wetlands
![]()
图 2 稻田和其他作物湿地处理污水浓度
a. 总氮; b. 总磷
Figure 2. Concentration of treated wastewater in paddy and other crop wetlands
a. total nitrogen; b. total phosphorus
![]()
图 3 稻田和其他作物湿地污水去除效率
a. 总氮; b. 总磷
Figure 3. Wastewater removal efficiency in paddy and other crop wetlands
a. total nitrogen; b. total phosphorus
![]()
图 4 作物湿地氮磷去除机理及对湿地的影响
Figure 4. Nitrogen and phosphorus removal mechanism of crop wetland and its impact on wetland
表 1 作物湿地的特征及运行效果
Table 1 Characteristics and operational effects of crop wetlands
污水类型
Sewage type湿地类型
Wetland type湿地作物
Wetland crop填料
Substrate进水方式
WFP水力停
留时间
HRT(d)水力负荷
HLR [m3/(m2·d)]湿地面积
Wetland
area (m2)作物产量
Crop yield
(kg/ha)进水水质
TN (%)去除率
TP (%)参考文献
ReferenceInfluent quality
TN (mg/L)Removal rate
TP (mg/L)农村生活污水 表面流 水稻 土壤 间歇流 20 9000 8.45 69.30 [8] 20 8500 2.3 62.90 20 8300 4.5 66.00 受污染河水 表面流 饲料水稻 石头、沙子、粉沙、黏土 连续流 0.28 0.20 30 2.53 39.92 [9] 污水厂尾水 表面流 水稻 土壤 间歇流 13.45 0.72 55.63 86.98 [10] 农业废水 表面流 黑藻、茭白、荷花、菱角 土壤 间歇流 7—14 2500 4.5 0.13 31.11 22.20 [11] 农村生活污水 表面流 水稻 土壤 间歇流 20 8648 0.41 65.40 [12] 间歇流 20 8353 0.21 60.30 间歇流 20 9324 0.59 71.40 市政污水 表面流 水稻 土壤 间歇流 25 0.03 1.50 4900 15 2 64.00 40.00 [13] 0.02 1.50 4700 17.2 3.40 82.60 95.28 农村生活污水 水平流 香蒲、芦竹、滨海藜 砾石、沙子 连续流 8.00 0.04 5600 22.4 1.70 57.30 76.30 [14] 农村生活污水 表面流 水稻 土壤 间歇流 20 30.20 65.70 [15] 20 27.50 71.40 20 32.70 60.30 市政污水 表面流 野茭白 土壤 连续流 2-5 0.04 500 20 1.95 48.50 51.30 [16] 市政污水 表面流 野生稻 土壤 1.95 58.10 64.50 [17] 受污染河水 表面流 水稻、荷花、金鱼藻 土壤 连续流 2.00 0.09 1,900,000 521.42 0.5 45.61 [18] 农业废水 表面流 水稻 土壤 间歇流 0.42 0.67 312 9740 1.9 0.17 44.90 43.00 [19] 农业废水 表面流 海水稻 土壤 间歇流 0.83 0.51 0.76 91.00 [20] 农村生活污水 表面流 水稻 土壤 间歇式 25 0.02 250 8085 2.1 0.41 [21] 农村生活污水 潜流 西红柿 砾石、
沙子连续流 1.80 0.22 6.8 7,300 6.7 10.00 [22] 市政污水 水平流 甘蔗 砖块碎片 连续流 0.99 107000 30 10.6 60.00 77.00 [23] 甘蔗 碎石灰石 连续流 0.99 67000 30 10.6 58.00 68.00 市政污水 水平流 甘蔗 建筑骨料、砖块、椰糠 间歇流 2.00 0.05 0.56 20.69 79.93 [24] 市政污水 水平流 荠菜 砾石、陶粒、黏土 连续流 1.25 0.20 0.75 45 2.03 76.53 79.89 [25] 芹菜 砾石、陶粒、黏土 连续流 1.25 0.20 0.75 40.345 2.03 71.73 71.95 水芹 砾石、陶粒、黏土 连续流 1.25 0.20 0.75 43.914 2.03 73.41 80.95 污水厂
尾水浮岛 韭葱 砾石、
陶粒连续流 1.25 0.20 0.75 30.1 2.86 47.89 [26] 水平流 茄子 砾石、
陶粒连续流 1.25 0.20 0.75 30.1 2.86 21.47 浮岛 空心菜 砾石、
陶粒连续流 1.25 0.20 0.75 30.1 2.86 35.38 水平流 辣椒 砾石、
陶粒连续流 1.25 0.20 0.75 30.1 2.86 市政污水 浮岛、水平流 黄秋葵 砾石、
陶粒连续流 1.25 0.20 1.50 28.12 2.27 45.10 68.50 [27] 浮岛、水平流 茄子 砾石、
陶粒连续流 1.25 0.20 1.50 28.12 2.27 33.60 53.60 浮岛、水平流 辣椒 砾石、
陶粒连续流 1.25 0.20 1.50 28.12 2.27 36.30 59.80 市政污水 水平流、垂直流 黑麦草 砾石 间歇流 3 0.03 8.48 8 25.80 [28] 冬小麦 砾石 间歇流 3 0.05 8.48 4 37.90 农村生活污水 水平流 空心菜 砾石 连续流 3.25 0.30 1.88 14.9 1.10 76.60 78.90 [29] 农业废水 表面流 水稻 土壤 间歇流 8100 [30] 注: TN指污水中总氮浓度; TP指污水中总磷浓度; WFP指进水方式; HRT指水力停留时间; HLR指水力负荷; 下同Note: TN refers to the total nitrogen concentration in sewage; TP refers to the total phosphorus; WFP refers to Water flow pattern; HRT refers to hydraulic retention time; HLR refers to the hydraulic loading rate. The same applies below 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 作物湿地作物产量
Table 2 Crop wetlands crop yield
污水类型
Sewage type湿地类型
Wetland type湿地作物
Wetland crop湿地面积
Wetland area (m2)作物产量
Crop yield (kg/ha)参考文献
Reference农村生活污水 黑水 表面自由流 水稻 20 9000 [8] 灰水 水稻 20 8500 生活废水 水稻 20 8300 地表水 水稻 20 8100 农村生活污水 黑水 表面自由流 水稻 20 8353.3 [12] 灰水 水稻 20 9324.3 生活废水 水稻 20 8647.9 地表水 水稻 20 8121.9 市政污水 表面自由流 水稻 1.5 4900 [13] 受污染河水 表面自由流 水稻 1900000 521.42 [18] 农业废水 表面自由流 水稻 312 9740 [19] 农村生活废水 表面自由流 水稻 250 8050 [21] 农村生活污水 潜流 西红柿 6.8 7300 [22] 市政污水 水平流 甘蔗 0.99 107000 [23] 甘蔗 0.99 67000
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] Wu H, Wang R, Yan P, et al. Constructed wetlands for pollution control [J]. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 2023, 4(4): 218-234.
[2] Kataki S, Chatterjee S, Vairale M G, et al. Constructed wetland, an eco-technology for wastewater treatment: a review on types of wastewater treated and components of the technology (macrophyte, biolfilm and substrate) [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2021, 283: 111986. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.111986
[3] Su Y, He S, Wang K, et al. Quantifying the sustainability of three types of agricultural production in China: an emergy analysis with the integration of environmental pollution [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 252: 119650. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119650
[4] Fu H, Tan P, Wang R, et al. Advances in organophosphorus pesticides pollution: Current status and challenges in ecotoxicological, sustainable agriculture, and degradation strategies [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2022, 424: 127494.
[5] Nelson M, Wolverton B C. Plants+soil/wetland microbes: Food crop systems that also clean air and water [J]. Advances in Space Research, 2011, 47(4): 582-590.
[6] Kuntashula E, Sileshi G, Mafongoya P L, et al. Farmer participatory evaluation of the potential for organic vegetable production in the wetlands of Zambia [J]. Outlook on Agriculture, 2006, 35(4): 299-305.
[7] Freeman B W J, Evans C D, Musarika S, et al. Responsible agriculture must adapt to the wetland character of mid-latitude peatlands [J]. Global Change Biology, 2022, 28(12): 3795-3811.
[8] Li S, Li H, Liang X, et al. Rural wastewater irrigation and nitrogen removal by the paddy wetland system in the Tai Lake region of China [J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2009, 9(5): 433-442.
[9] Zhou S, Hosomi M. Nitrogen transformations and balance in a constructed wetland for nutrient-polluted river water treatment using forage rice in Japan [J]. Ecological Engineering, 2008, 32(2): 147-155.
[10] Ma R, Duan J, Xue L, et al. Treatment of nitrogen and phosphorus from sewage tailwater in paddy rice wetlands: concept and environmental benefits [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2024, 196(2): 174.
[11] Xiong Y, Peng S, Luo Y, et al. A paddy eco-ditch and wetland system to reduce non-point source pollution from rice-based production system while maintaining water use efficiency [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2015, 22(6): 4406-4417. doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-3697-7
[12] Li S, Li H, Liang X Q, et al. Phosphorus removal of rural wastewater by the paddy-rice-wetland system in Tai Lake Basin [J]. Journal of hazardous materials, 2009, 171(1/2/3): 301-308.
[13] Kantawanichkul S, Duangjaisak W. Domestic wastewater treatment by a constructed wetland system planted with rice [J]. Water Science and Technology, 2011, 64(12): 2376-2380. doi: 10.2166/wst.2011.806
[14] Sun H, Zhang H, Yu Z, et al. Combination system of full-scale constructed wetlands and wetland paddy fields to remove nitrogen and phosphorus from rural unregulated non-point sources [J]. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 2013, 35(6): 801-809.
[15] Li S, Liu S H, Chen Y X. Experiment on the Treatment of the Rural Wastewater by the Paddy Wetland System [J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2012, 347: 2103-2106.
[16] Abe K, Komada M, Ookuma A, et al. Purification performance of a shallow free-water-surface constructed wetland receiving secondary effluent for about 5 years [J]. Ecological Engineering, 2014, 69: 126-133. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.03.040
[17] Kogi J, Miyamoto M, Bolthouse J, et al. The potential for abandoned paddy fields to reduce pollution loads from households in suburban Tokyo [J]. Water, 2010, 2(3): 649-667.
[18] 乐文彩, 张玉, 刘青, 等. 长江流域稻田湿地设计及运行效果 [J]. 中国给水排水, 2024, 40(5): 111-115.] Le W C, Zhang Y, Liu Q, et al. Design of paddy wetland and its operation performance in the Yangtze River Basin [J]. China Water & Wastewater, 2024, 40(5): 111-115. [
[19] 邹宏硕, 傅敏, 肖梦蝶, 等. 基于多功能耦合的潮汐流稻田湿地生态净化系统研究 [J]. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2024(1): 58-67.] Zou H S, Fu M, Xiao M D, et al. Study on ecological purification system of tidal-flow paddy wetland based on multifunctional coupling [J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Natural Science), 2024(1): 58-67. [
[20] 张新新, 李婷, 李少文, 等. 海水稻田湿地对半咸水对虾养殖池塘水环境的净化作用研究 [J]. 南方水产科学, 2023, 19(3): 19-28.] Zhang X X, Li T, Li S W, et al. Purification effect of searice paddy field on brackish water environment of shrimp culture [J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2023, 19(3): 19-28. [
[21] 薛利红, 杨林章. 太湖流域稻田湿地对低污染水中氮磷的净化效果 [J]. 环境科学研究, 2015, 28(1): 117-124.] Xue L H, Yang L Z. Purification of water with low concentrations of N and P in paddy wetlands in Taihu Lake Region [J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2015, 28(1): 117-124. [
[22] Caselles Osorio A, Mendoza P G, et al. Tomato (Lycopersicum sculentum) production in sub surface flow constructed wetlands for domestic wastewater treatment in rural a Colombian community [J]. Ingeniería Investigación y Tecnología, 2018, 19(4): 1-10.
[23] Mateus D, Vaz M, Capela I, et al. The potential growth of sugarcane in constructed wetlands designed for tertiary treatment of wastewater [J]. Water, 2016, 8(3): 93. doi: 10.3390/w8030093
[24] Boopathi N, Kadarkarai R. A laboratory-scale study of residential greywater treatment with sugarcane in a constructed wetland [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2022, 29(40): 61178-61186.
[25] Hussain I, Lu X, Hussain J, et al. Nutrients removal efficiency assessment of constructed wetland for the rural domestic wastewater growing distinct species of vegetation [J]. Journal of Environmental & Analytical Toxicology, 2018, 8(588): 2161-0525.1000588.
[26] Abbasi H, Vasileva V, Lu X. The influence of the ratio of nitrate to ammonium nitrogen on nitrogen removal in the economical growth of vegetation in hybrid constructed wetlands [J]. Environments, 2017, 4(1): 24. doi: 10.3390/environments4010024
[27] Abbasi H N, Ahmad W, Ali Shahzad K, et al. Evaluating the potential of Abelmoschus esculentus, Solanum Melongena, and Capsicum annuum spp. for nutrient and microbial reduction from wastewater in hybrid constructed wetland [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2024, 196(3): 293. doi: 10.1007/s10661-024-12474-9
[28] 任勇翔, 杨春辉, 孙军峰, 等. 冬小麦和黑麦草作为寒冷季节人工湿地栽培作物处理城市污水效果研究 [J]. 西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 44(5): 714-719.] Ren Y X, Yang C H, Sun J F, et al. Effects on the wastewater treatment with Triticum aestivum L. and Lolium perenne L. as cultivated plant in hydroponic ditch and hybrid constructed wetland in cold season [J]. Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2012, 44(5): 714-719. [
[29] Gong L, Chen G, Li J, et al. Utilization of rural domestic sewage tailwaters by Ipomoea aquatica in different hydroponic vegetable and constructed wetland systems [J]. Water Science and Technology, 2020, 82(2): 386-400.
[30] 郭凤鸣, 孙潜, 王一娟. “二坝三池+稻田” 养殖尾水处理模式案例 [J]. 科学养鱼, 2023(2): 24-25.] Guo F M, Sun Q, Wang Y J. Case study of “two dams and three ponds+paddy field” aquaculture tail water treatment model [J]. Scientific Fish Farming, 2023(2): 24-25. [
[31] Yoon C G. Wise use of paddy rice fields to partially compensate for the loss of natural wetlands [J]. Paddy and Water Environment, 2009, 7(4): 357-366. doi: 10.1007/s10333-009-0178-6
[32] Feyissa M E, Cao J, Tolera H. Integrated remote sensing–GIS analysis of urban wetland potential for crop farming: a case study of Nekemte district, western Ethiopia [J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2019, 78(5): 153. doi: 10.1007/s12665-019-8149-8
[33] Kulshreshtha N M, Verma V, Soti A, et al. Exploring the contribution of plant species in the performance of constructed wetlands for domestic wastewater treatment [J]. Bioresource Technology Reports, 2022, 18: 101038. doi: 10.1016/j.biteb.2022.101038
[34] Kuntashula E, Mafongoya P L, Sileshi G, et al. Potential of biomass transfer technologies in sustaining vegetable production in the wetlands (DAMBOS) of eastern Zambia [J]. Experimental Agriculture, 2004, 40(1): 37-51. doi: 10.1017/S001447970300142X
[35] Boog J, Nivala J, Kalbacher T, et al. Do wastewater pollutants impact oxygen transfer in aerated horizontal flow wetlands? [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 383: 123173. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.123173
[36] Kadlec R H, Bastiaens W, Urban D T. Hydrological design of free water surface treatment wetlands [M]//Constructed Wetlands for Water Quality Improvement. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2020: 77-86.
[37] Lu H F, Tan Y W, Zhang W S, et al. Integrated emergy and economic evaluation of Lotus-root production systems on reclaimed wetlands surrounding the Pearl River Estuary, China [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 158: 367-379. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.016
[38] Dierberg F E, DeBusk T A, Jackson S D, et al. Submerged aquatic vegetation-based treatment wetlands for removing phosphorus from agricultural runoff: response to hydraulic and nutrient loading [J]. Water Research, 2002, 36(6): 1409-1422. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00354-2
[39] Yang S, Xu J, Zhang J, et al. Reduction of non-point source pollution from paddy fields through controlled drainage in an aquatic vegetable wetland–ecological ditch system [J]. Irrigation and Drainage, 2016, 65(5): 734-740. doi: 10.1002/ird.2058
[40] Jain A, Roshnibala S, Kanjilal P, et al. Aquatic/semi-aquatic plants used in herbal remedies in the wetlands of Manipur, Northeastern India [J]. The Indian journal of traditional knowledge, 2007, 6(2): 346-351.
[41] Vymazal J. Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment [J]. Water, 2010, 2(3): 530-549. doi: 10.3390/w2030530
[42] Brix H, Arias C A. The use of vertical flow constructed wetlands for on-site treatment of domestic wastewater: New Danish guidelines [J]. Ecological Engineering, 2005, 25(5): 491-500. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.07.009
[43] Soundaranayaki K, Gandhimathi R. Performance of various media in vertical flow constructed wetland for the treatment of domestic wastewater [J]. Desalination and Water Treatment, 2019, 146: 57-67. doi: 10.5004/dwt.2019.23566
[44] 国家环境保护总局. 城镇污水处理厂污染物排放标准 [M]. 国家质检总局. 2002: 13P.; A4.] State Environmental Protection Administration. Urban sewage treatment plant pollutant discharge standard [M]. Aqsiq. 2002: 13P.; A4. [
[45] Yin A, Duan J, Xue L, et al. High yield and mitigation of N-loss from paddy fields obtained by irrigation using optimized application of sewage tail water [J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2020, 304 : 107137.
[46] Ikeda H, Osawa T. Comparison of adaptability to nitrogen source among vegetable crops II. Growth response and accumulation of ammonium-and nitrate-nitrogen of leaf vegetables cultured in nutrient solution containing nitrate, ammonium, and nitrite as nitrogen sources [J]. Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science, 1980, 48(4): 435-42. doi: 10.2503/jjshs.48.435
[47] 卢少勇, 金相灿, 余刚. 人工湿地的磷去除机理 [J]. 生态环境, 2006, 15(2): 391-396.] Lu S Y, Jin X C, Yu G. Phosphorus removal mechanism of constructed wetland [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2006, 15(2): 391-396. [
[48] Lin X, Eguchi S, Maeda S, et al. Combined effects of oxygen and temperature on nitrogen removal in a nitrate-rich ex-paddy wetland [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 779: 146254. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146254
[49] Sagehashi M, Zhou S, Naruse T, et al. Nitrogen dynamics and biomass production in a vertical flow constructed wetland cultivated with forage rice and their mathematical modeling [J]. Journal of Water and Environment Technology, 2009, 7(4): 251-266.
[50] 郭海瑞, 赵立纯, 窦超银. 稻田人工湿地氮磷去除机制及其研究进展 [J]. 江苏农业科学, 2018, 46(6): 23-26.] Guo H R ZHAO L C DOU C Y. Mechanisms of nitrogen and phosphorus removal in paddy wetland and its research progress [J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 46(6): 23-26. [
[51] Murase J, Asiloglu R. Protists: the hidden ecosystem players in a wetland rice field soil [J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2024, 60(6): 773-787.
[52] Wu Y, Liu J, Rene E R. Periphytic biofilms: a promising nutrient utilization regulator in wetlands [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 248: 44-48.
[53] Parde D, Patwa A, Shukla A, et al. A review of constructed wetland on type, treatment and technology of wastewater [J]. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 2021, 21: 101261.
[54] Scholz M, Lee B H. Constructed wetlands: a review [J]. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 2005, 62(4): 421-447.
[55] Tanner C C. Plants for constructed wetland treatment systems—a comparison of the growth and nutrient uptake of eight emergent species [J]. Ecological Engineering, 1996, 7(1): 59-83. doi: 10.1016/0925-8574(95)00066-6
[56] Ruan W, Cai H, Xu X, et al. Efficiency and plant indication of nitrogen and phosphorus removal in constructed wetlands: a field-scale study in a frost-free area [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 799: 149301. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149301
[57] Zhao Z, Song X, Xiao Y, et al. Influences of seasons, N/P ratios and chemical compounds on phosphorus removal performance in algal pond combined with constructed wetlands [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 573: 906-914. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.148
[58] Kantawanichkul S, Duangjaisak W. Domestic wastewater treatment by a constructed wetland system planted with rice [J]. Water Science and Technology, 2011, 64(12): 2376-2380. doi: 10.2166/wst.2011.806
[59] Yang C, Zhang X, Tang Y, et al. Selection and optimization of the substrate in constructed wetland: a review [J]. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 2022, 49: 103140. doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.103140
[60] Ji Z, Tang W, Pei Y. Constructed wetland substrates: a review on development, function mechanisms, and application in contaminants removal [J]. Chemosphere, 2022, 286: 131564. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131564
[61] Abdoli S, Asgari Lajayer B, Dehghanian Z, et al. A review of the efficiency of phosphorus removal and recovery from wastewater by physicochemical and biological processes: challenges and opportunities [J]. Water, 2024, 16(17): 2507. doi: 10.3390/w16172507
[62] Omar A, Almomani F, Qiblawey H, et al. Advances in nitrogen-rich wastewater treatment: a comprehensive review of modern technologies [J]. Sustainability, 2024, 16(5): 2112. doi: 10.3390/su16052112
[63] Shelef O, Gross A, Rachmilevitch S. Role of plants in a constructed wetland: current and new perspectives [J]. Water, 2013, 5(2): 405-419. doi: 10.3390/w5020405
[64] Stottmeister U, Wießner A, Kuschk P, et al. Effects of plants and microorganisms in constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment [J]. Biotechnology Advances, 2003, 22(1/2): 93-117.
[65] Vymazal J. Removal of nutrients in constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment through plant harvesting–Biomass and load matter the most [J]. Ecological Engineering, 2020, 155: 105962. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.105962
[66] Zheng Y, Yang D, Dzakpasu M, et al. Effects of plants competition on critical bacteria selection and pollutants dynamics in a long-term polyculture constructed wetland [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2020, 316: 123927. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123927
[67] Panneerselvam P, Senapati A, Chidambaranathan P, et al. Long-term impact of pulses crop rotation on soil fungal diversity in aerobic and wetland rice cultivation [J]. Fungal Biology, 2023, 127(6): 1053-1066.
[68] Reddy L, Kumar D, Asolekar S R. Typologies for successful operation and maintenance of horizontal sub-surface flow constructed wetlands [J]. Sciences, 2014, 6(12): 157-164.
[69] Stein L Y. The long-term relationship between microbial metabolism and greenhouse gases [J]. Trends in Microbiology, 2020, 28(6): 500-511.
[70] Wang J, Chon K, Ren X, et al. Effects of beneficial microorganisms on nutrient removal and excess sludge production in an anaerobic-anoxic/oxic (A2O) process for municipal wastewater treatment [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2019, 281: 90-98. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.02.047
[71] 汪熙琮, 田卓亚, 杨彩艳, 等. 采纳稻田综合种养模式能否提升农户效益? ——以稻虾共作模式为例 [J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2023, 28(10): 259-274.] Wang X C, Tian Z Y, Yang C Y, et al. Can the adoption of rice-aquaculture integrated cultivation mode improve farmers' benefits? A case study of rice and crayfish coculture pattern [J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2023, 28(10): 259-274. [
[72] Natuhara Y. Ecosystem services by paddy fields as substitutes of natural wetlands in Japan [J]. Ecological Engineering, 2013, 56: 97-106. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.04.026
[73] 杨大柳, 胡中泽, 衣政伟, 等. 泰州市稻田综合种养产业发展分析及建议 [J]. 中国稻米, 2020, 26(1): 108-110.] Yang D L, Hu Z Z, Yi Z W, et al. Analysis and suggestion on the development of comprehensive planting and breeding industry in paddy field in Taizhou City [J]. China Rice, 2020, 26(1): 108-110. [
[74] 杨钰, 戴凌云, 宋长太. 盐都区发展稻渔综合种养的历史、现状与对策措施 [J]. 水产养殖, 2020, 41(2): 69-70.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2091.2020.02.022 Yang Y, Dai L Y, Song C T. History, present situation and countermeasures of developing comprehensive planting and breeding of rice and fishery in Yandu District [J]. Journal of Aquaculture, 2020, 41(2): 69-70. [ doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2091.2020.02.022
[75] 李戎, 易苏丹, 赵文龙, 等. 江汉平原“稻-再生稻-鸭” 稻田综合种养与中稻、再生稻种植模式的水稻产量、构成与经济效益分析 [J]. 中南农业科技, 2024, 45(12): 134-141.] Li R, Yi S D, Zhao W L, et al. Analysis of rice yield, composition and economic benefit of “rice-ratooning rice-duck” paddy field comprehensive cultivation and planting mode of middle rice and ratooning rice in Jianghan Plain [J]. South-Central Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 45(12): 134-141. [
[76] 陈静, 何吉祥, 黄龙, 等. 稻—再生稻—小龙虾稻田综合种养经济效益分析 [J]. 安徽农学通报, 2024, 30(3): 139-144.] Chen J, He J X, Huang L, et al. Analysis of economic benefit of rice-ratooning rice-crayfish integrated cultivation in paddy field [J]. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 30(3): 139-144. [
[77] Zhang J, Hu L, Ren W, et al. Rice-soft shell turtle coculture effects on yield and its environment [J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2016, 224 : 116-122.
[78] 怀燕, 王岳钧, 陈叶平, 等. 稻田综合种养模式的化肥减量效应分析 [J]. 中国稻米, 2018, 24(5): 30-34.] Huai Y, Wang Y J, Chen Y P, et al. Chemical fertilizer reduction analysis of rice-based co-culture system [J]. China Rice, 2018, 24(5): 30-34. [
[79] 孔勇. 稻田综合种养模式对水稻病虫草害的控制作用及机理 [J]. 农村经济与科技, 2019, 30(4): 13-14.] Kong Y. Control effect and mechanism of comprehensive planting and breeding model in rice field on rice diseases, pests and weeds [J]. Rural Economy and Science-Technology, 2019, 30(4): 13-14. [
[80] Allred B J, Gamble D L, Clevenger W B, et al. Crop yield summary for three wetland reservoir subirrigation systems in northwest Ohio [J]. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 2014, 30(6): 889-903.
[81] Dong B, Mao Z, Brown L, et al. Irrigation ponds: Possibility and potentials for the treatment of drainage water from paddy fields in Zhanghe Irrigation System [J]. Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences, 2009, 52(11): 3320-3327. doi: 10.1007/s11431-009-0364-1
[82] Al-Bahry S N, Mahmoud I Y, Al-Musharafi S K, et al. Microbial and chemical pollution of water-wells relative to sewage effluents in Oman [J]. IAFOR Journal of Sustainability, Energy & the Environment, 2014, 1 (1): 35-56.
[83] Cao Q, Wang H, Chen X, et al. Composition and distribution of microbial communities in natural river wetlands and corresponding constructed wetlands [J]. Ecological Engineering, 2017, 98: 40-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.10.063
[84] Galvão A, Matos J, Silva M, et al. Constructed wetland performance and potential for microbial removal [J]. Desalination and Water Treatment, 2009, 4(1/2/3): 76-84.
[85] Russo N, Marzo A, Randazzo C, et al. Constructed wetlands combined with disinfection systems for removal of urban wastewater contaminants [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 656: 558-566. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.417
[86] Otter P, Hertel S, Ansari J, et al. Disinfection for decentralized wastewater reuse in rural areas through wetlands and solar driven onsite chlorination [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 721: 137595. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137595
[87] Kaliakatsos A, Kalogerakis N, Manios T, et al. Efficiency of two constructed wetland systems for wastewater treatment: removal of bacterial indicators and enteric viruses [J]. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 2019, 94(7): 2123-2130.
[88] 温明铎, 陈文兵, 高自豪, 等. 污水处理厂新兴污染物赋存及末端控制技术进展 [J]. 净水技术, 2022, 41(5): 14-22.] Wen M D, Chen W B, Gao Z H, et al. Technological progress in occurrence and end control of emerging contaminants in WWTP [J]. Water Purification Technology, 2022, 41(5): 14-22. [
[89] Fan Y, Sun S, He S. Iron plaque formation and its effect on key elements cycling in constructed wetlands: Functions and outlooks [J]. Water Research, 2023, 235: 119837. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2023.119837
[90] Yu G, Wang G, Chi T, et al. Enhanced removal of heavy metals and metalloids by constructed wetlands: a review of approaches and mechanisms [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 821: 153516. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153516
-
期刊类型引用(17)
1. 程万，肖丕清，王素钦，王伯华，寻晴，罗玉双. 鱼类病原真菌水霉及其防控研究进展. 微生物学通报. 2024(10): 3781-3804 . 
百度学术
2. 孔庆辉，刘海平，刘锁珠，索朗斯珠，徐业芬，赵晓玲，商振达. 巨须裂腹鱼水霉菌的分离鉴定及其对脾脏转录组的影响. 水产学报. 2023(08): 135-144 . 百度学术
3. 何丛丛，蒋蓓蕾. 鱼水霉病的防治. 当代畜禽养殖业. 2020(09): 63-64 . 百度学术
4. 魏冬梅，段魏魏，陈真，王咏星. 新疆五家渠地区鱼类水霉病病原菌18S rDNA序列系统分类分析. 江苏农业科学. 2019(15): 194-199 . 百度学术
5. 杨移斌，姜兰，宋怿，董靖，胥宁，艾晓辉. 黄颡鱼体表溃烂症初步研究. 淡水渔业. 2019(05): 51-55 . 百度学术
6. 魏冬梅，申慧，陈真，王咏星. 新疆五家渠鱼类水霉病原菌18S rDNA序列不同软件系统分析. 基因组学与应用生物学. 2019(11): 4944-4950 . 百度学术
7. 李晨曦，吕欢，胡殿明. 江西水生卵菌研究(Ⅰ):形态特征与系统分类. 生物灾害科学. 2015(03): 175-181 . 百度学术
8. 甄珍，王荻，刘红柏，范兆廷. 山女鳟水霉病病原的分离鉴定及其生物学特性. 江西农业大学学报. 2015(02): 333-338 . 百度学术
9. 叶鑫，赵依妮，曹海鹏，胡鲲，杨先乐. SpHtp1基因在不同种属水霉菌株中的分布. 华中农业大学学报. 2014(05): 99-104 . 百度学术
10. 张楠，王浩，丁庆忠，唐明虎，吕利群. 我国淡水养殖动物主要致病性水霉菌病原的分析. 上海海洋大学学报. 2014(01): 80-89 . 百度学术
11. 许佳露，曹海鹏，欧仁建，杨先乐. 黄颡鱼卵水霉病病原的分离鉴定及其无性繁殖特性. 微生物学通报. 2012(04): 579-587 . 百度学术
12. 邱并生. 黄颡鱼卵水酶病. 微生物学通报. 2012(04): 578 . 百度学术
13. 欧仁建，曹海鹏，郑卫东，胡鲲，许佳露，杨先乐. 黄颡鱼卵致病性绵霉的分离鉴定与药敏特性. 微生物学通报. 2012(09): 1280-1289 . 百度学术
14. 王浩，张楠，杨先乐，吕利群. 水霉菌环介导等温扩增检测方法的建立. 微生物学通报. 2012(12): 1835-1843 . 百度学术
15. 陈本亮，张其中. 水霉及水霉病防治的研究进展. 水产科学. 2011(07): 429-434 . 百度学术
16. 夏文伟，曹海鹏，王浩，张世奇，杨先乐. 彭泽鲫卵源致病性水霉的鉴定及其生物学特性. 微生物学通报. 2011(01): 57-62 . 百度学术
17. 崔丽娜，高淑霞，姜文学，杨丽萍，张振杰，牛钟相. 山东兔场皮肤真菌病病原rDNA-ITS区序列测定及分析. 中国兽医学报. 2011(12): 1749-1754+1768 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(21)
计量
- 文章访问数: 10
- HTML全文浏览量: 4
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 38