卵形鲳鯵对刺激隐核虫的免疫应答和免疫保护研究

但学明, 李安兴, 林小涛, 柏建山, 张海发

但学明, 李安兴, 林小涛, 柏建山, 张海发. 卵形鲳鯵对刺激隐核虫的免疫应答和免疫保护研究[J]. 水生生物学报, 2008, 32(1): 13-18.
引用本文: 但学明, 李安兴, 林小涛, 柏建山, 张海发. 卵形鲳鯵对刺激隐核虫的免疫应答和免疫保护研究[J]. 水生生物学报, 2008, 32(1): 13-18.
DAN Xue-Ming, LI An-Xing, LIN Xiao-Tao, BAI Jian-Shan, ZHANG Hai-Fa. IMMUNE RESPONSE AND IMMUNOPROTECTION OF POMPANOS (TRACHINOTUS OVATUS) AGAINST CRYPTOCARYON IRRITANS[J]. ACTA HYDROBIOLOGICA SINICA, 2008, 32(1): 13-18.
Citation: DAN Xue-Ming, LI An-Xing, LIN Xiao-Tao, BAI Jian-Shan, ZHANG Hai-Fa. IMMUNE RESPONSE AND IMMUNOPROTECTION OF POMPANOS (TRACHINOTUS OVATUS) AGAINST CRYPTOCARYON IRRITANS[J]. ACTA HYDROBIOLOGICA SINICA, 2008, 32(1): 13-18.

卵形鲳鯵对刺激隐核虫的免疫应答和免疫保护研究

基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金(30440052)

广东省科技计划项目(2007B080701009)

珠海市科技计划项目(200411022)

惠州市科技计划项目(2006P58)

华南农业大学校长科学基金资助

IMMUNE RESPONSE AND IMMUNOPROTECTION OF POMPANOS (TRACHINOTUS OVATUS) AGAINST CRYPTOCARYON IRRITANS

  • 摘要: 用刺激隐核虫(Cryptocaryon irritans)的幼虫对卵形鲳鯵(Trachinotus ovatus)进行腹腔注射和体表感染,然后每隔一周用阻动试验(Immobilization assay)检测免疫鱼的抗血清和皮肤培养液对刺激隐核虫幼虫的阻动效价,在第14周中,分别用亚致死剂量和致死剂量的刺激隐核虫幼虫对免疫鱼攻毒以检测所产生的免疫保护力。实验结果显示:两种免疫方法都能让卵形鲳鯵的血清和皮肤生成阻动刺激隐核虫幼虫的特异性抗体,并能使被免疫鱼获得明显的免疫保护,但是体表感染免疫组的血清和皮肤培养液的阻动效价都要比腹腔注射免疫组高,所获得的免疫保护力也更强。同时还发现,免疫鱼血清和皮肤培养液中的抗体存在明显的差异:两者的最初生成时间、达到峰值的时间、变化规律以及阻动效价等都不一致。因此,我们推测鱼类的系统免疫应答和皮肤黏膜免疫应答有可能是相互独立的,或者是不同步的。鱼类的体液免疫应答,特别是黏膜免疫应答对抵御刺激隐核虫的感染起了重要的作用,采用刺激隐核虫虫体疫苗可能成为预防海水鱼类白点病的一种选择。
    Abstract: The humoral immune responses and host protection of pompanos ( Trachinotus ovatus),against Cryptocaryon irritanswere determined after immunization with live theronts and killed theronts of. C. irritans. Two groups of pompanos (150 animalsper group) were immunized three times with live theronts of C. irritans by immersion at a dose of 8 103 theronts per fish or withkilled theronts of C. irritans by intraperitoneal (i. p. ) injection at a dose of 115 105 theronts per fish. The immobilization titersof antiserum and skin culture supernatant of the immunized fish were determined with an immobilization assay every two weeks.Also the immunized fish were challenged with a sublethal dose of theronts (6 103 theronts per fish) or lethal dose of theronts(2 104 theronts per fish) in Week 14. The level of C. irritans infection (indicated by relative infection level,RII) and survivalof pompanos were determined after C. irritans challenge. The results showed that the specific immobilizing antibodies could bedetected in both antiserum and skin culture supernatant in the immunized fish.Both immunization methods (immersion with livetheronts or i. p. injection with killed theronts) could confer protection to fish because when all fish were challenged with a lethaldose of theronts of C. irritans, some of the immunised fish survived,but all control fish died. There was a positive correlation be2tween higher levels of the specific immobilizing antibodies and host survival rate in the immunized fish. However,compared withi. p. injection with killed theronts,immersion with live theronts was more effective in stimulating immune responses,which indicat2ed by the higher immobilization titers in both antiserum and skin culture supernatant and the higher survival rate of the immunisedfish.When fish immunised with live theronts and killed theronts were challenged with a sublethal dose of theronts of C. irritans,the reduction rate of RII of C. irritans were 5016 % and 3712 % respectively. When fish were challenged with a lethal dose oftheronts of C. irritans,the survival rate of fish immunised with live theronts and killed theronts were 60 % and 40 % respectively.In both groups of fish,antibody levels in skin culture supernatant were much lower than those in serum. The immobilizing antibod2ies in serum and the immobilizing antibodies in skin culture supernatant of the immunized fish were different in terms of onset ofimmunity,timing,pattern of the peaks,and immobilization titers. Therefore,it is speculated that pathway of the systemic immuneresponses and mucosal immune responses were different. The present study indicates that humoral immune response,especiallymucosal immune response,plays an important role in protection against C. irritans infection.Vaccination may be an effective wayto prevent white spot disease of marine fish.
  • [1]

    Colorni A,Burgess P. Cryptocaryon irritans Brown 1951,the cause ofwhite spot disease in marine fish: an update [J]. Aquarium Sciencesand Conservation,1997,1:217-238

    [2]

    LomJ. Diseases caused by protistans [A]. In Kinne O ( Eds. ),Diseases of Marine Animals [C]. Hamburg: Biologische Anstalt Helgoland. 1984,114-168

    [3]

    Sikama Y. Preliminary report on the whitespot disease in marine fishes [J]. Suisan-Gakukai-Ho,1937,7:149-160

    [4]

    Sikama Y. Ueber die Weisspünktchenkrankheit bei Seefischen [J].Journal of the Shanghai Science Institute,1938,4:113-128

    [5]

    Nigrelli R,Ruggieri G. Enzootics in the New York aquarium causedby Cryptocaryon irritans Brown, 1951 ( = Ichthyophthirius marinusSikama,1961),a histophagous ciliate in the skin, eyes and gills ofmarine fishes [J]. Zoologica,1966,51:97-102

    [6]

    Wilkie D,Gordin H. Outbreak of Cryptocaryonosis in marine aquariaat scripps institution of oceanography [J]. California Fish and Game,1969,55:227-236

    [7]

    Burgess P J,Matthews R A. Fish host range of seven isolates of Cryp2tocaryon irritans [J]. Journal of Fish Biology,1995,46:727-729

    [8]

    Huff J,Burns C. Hypersaline and chemical control of Crytocaryon irritans in red snapper, Lutjanus campechanus,monoculture [J]. Aqua2culture,1981,22:181-184

    [9]

    Colorni A. Aspects of the biology of Cryptocaryon irritans,and hypos2alinity as a control measure in cultured gilt2head sea bream Sparusaurata [J]. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms,1985,1:19-22

    [10]

    Rasheed V. Diseases of cultured brown2spotted grouper Epinephelustauvina and silvery black porgy Acanthopagrus cuvieri in Kuwait [J].Journal of Aquatic Animal Health,1989,1:102-107

    [11]

    Matthews R,Burgess P. Cryptocaryon irritans (Ciliophora):primaryinfection in thick2lipped mullet Chelon labrosus (Risso) [J]. Journalof Fish Diseases,18:329-335

    [12]

    Hines R,Spira D. Ichthyophthiriasis in the mirrorcarp Cyprinus carpio(L. ) V. acquired immunity [J]. Journal of Fish Biology,1974,6:373-378

    [13]

    Wang X T,Dickerson H W. Surface immobilization antigen of the parasitic ciliate Ichthyophthirius multifiliis elicits protective immunity inchannel catfish ( Ictalurus punctatus ) [J]. Clinical and DiagnosticLaboratory,2002,9:176-181

    [14]

    Burgess P,Matthews R. Cryptocaryon irritans (Ciliophora):acquiredprotective immunity in the thicklipped mullet, Chelon labrosus [J].Fish and Shellfish Immunology,1995,5:459-468

    [15]

    Yoshinaga T,Nakazoe J. Acquired protection and production of immo2bilization antibody against Cryptocaryon irritans ( Ciliophora, Hy2menostomatida) in Mummichog ( Fundulus heteroclitus ) [J]. FishPathology,1997,32:229-230

    [16]

    Dan XM,Li A X,Lin X T, et al. A standardized method to propagateCryptocaryon irritans on a susceptible host pompano Trachinotus ova2tus [J]. Aquaculture,2006,258:127-133

    [17]

    Buchmann K,Sigh J,Nielsen C V, et al. Host responses against thefish parasitizing ciliate Ichthyophthirius multifiliis [J]. VeterinaryParasitology,2001,100:105-116

    [18]

    Dickerson H,Clark T. Ichthyophthirius multifiliis: a model of cutaneous infection and immunity in fishes [J]. Immunological Reviews,1998,166:377-384

    [19]

    Dickerson H W,Clark T G,Leff A A. Serotypic variation among isolates of Ichthyophthirius multifiliis based on immobilization [J]. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology,1993,40:816-820

    [20]

    Lin T L,Dickerson H W. Purification and partial characterization ofimmobilization antigens from Ichthyophthirius multifiliis [J]. TheJournal of Protozoology,1992,39:457-463

    [21]

    Maki J L,Dickerson H W. Systemic and cutaneous mucus antibody responses of channel catfish immunized against the protozoan parasiteIchthyophthirius multifiliis Clin [J]. Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology,2003,10:876-881

    [22]

    Xu D H, Klesius P H1 Antibody mediated immune response againstIchthyophthirius multifiliis using excised skin from channel catfish,Ictalurus punctactus (Rafinesque),immune to Ichthyophthirius [J].Journal of Fish Diseases,2002,25:299-306

    [23]

    Burkart M,Clark T,Dickerson H. Immunization of channel catfish, Ic2talurus punctatus Rafinesque,against Ichthyophthirius multifiliis (Fou21 期但学明等:卵形鲳 对刺激隐核虫的免疫应答和免疫保护研究 17quet):killed versus live vaccines [J]. Journal of Fish Biology,1990,13:401-410

    [24]

    Goven D A,Dawe D L, Gratzek J B. Protection of channel catfishagainst Ichthyophthirius multifiliis Fouquet by immunization [J].Journal of Fish Biology,1980,17:311-316

    [25]

    Lobb C J. Secretory immunity induced in catfish, Ictalurus punctatus,following bath immunization [J]. Developmental and Comparative Im2munology,1987,11:727-738

  • 期刊类型引用(2)

    1. 张旭光,陈佳,刘鑫,季遥. 水下金属的腐蚀电场诱发西伯利亚鲟摄食行为反应. 中国水产科学. 2021(10): 1272-1280 . 百度学术
    2. 李超,王晓杰,宋佳坤. 鱼类的侧线机械感受系统和仿生学等应用研究. 科学通报. 2017(22): 2509-2519 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(2)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  1032
  • HTML全文浏览量:  4
  • PDF下载量:  811
  • 被引次数: 4
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2006-11-18
  • 修回日期:  2007-03-26
  • 发布日期:  2008-01-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回