ZHOU Jie, WANG Dong. SURVIVAL STRATEGIES OF STEM FRAGMENTS IN NARROW ENDEMIC AND WIDESPREAD PLANTS OF THE AQUATIC GENUS MYRIOPHYLLUM[J]. ACTA HYDROBIOLOGICA SINICA, 2012, 36(2): 316-322. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1035.2012.00316
Citation: ZHOU Jie, WANG Dong. SURVIVAL STRATEGIES OF STEM FRAGMENTS IN NARROW ENDEMIC AND WIDESPREAD PLANTS OF THE AQUATIC GENUS MYRIOPHYLLUM[J]. ACTA HYDROBIOLOGICA SINICA, 2012, 36(2): 316-322. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1035.2012.00316

SURVIVAL STRATEGIES OF STEM FRAGMENTS IN NARROW ENDEMIC AND WIDESPREAD PLANTS OF THE AQUATIC GENUS MYRIOPHYLLUM

  • Received Date: January 19, 2011
  • Rev Recd Date: October 23, 2011
  • Published Date: March 24, 2012
  • For some aquatic macrophytes, stem fragment formed by disturbance plays a key role in the dispersal and establishment of the species. Previous studies have been focused on the regeneration abilities of sterm fragments of a range of aquatic species. However, the information on regeneration ability of fragments between narrow endemic and its congeneric widespread species is lacking. Our study examined the combined effects of fragment length and fragment location on regeneration performances of narrow endemic (Myriophyllum oguraense Miki subsp. yangtzense Wang) and widespread (M. spicatum L.) species, two submerged macrophytes in shallow lakes of the lower Yangtze River basin of China, by an outdoor experiment. Stem fragments from one genotype of population were planted separately in plastic pots by three fragment lengths (5 cm, 10 cm and 15 cm) and three fragment locations (apex, midstem and bottom). The objective of this study were to determine (1) whether fragment length and location correlate with the growth and regeneration abilities of the studied species, and (2) whether the growth and regeneration abilities of fragments differ between the narrow endemic and its congenetic widespread species. The results showed that total plant biomass, total branch biomass and branch number increased significantly with increasing fragment length between all treatments at the fragment level for both species. Total plant biomass, total branch biomass and branch number were greatly different between three length treatments, which were the greatest for fragments of 15 cm in length compared with the other two fragment length treatments. Additionally, the growth and regeneration performance of the studied species were significantly affected by fragment location. There were remarkable differences between the growth of sterm fragments with apices and those without apices. Plant from apical fragments had the largest plant biomass, and midstem fragments regenerated the largest branch biomass, the most lateral branches and the longest branches. Fragments without apices showed significant greater branch number and branch biomass compared with the ones with apices, except that those traits of bottom fragments were intermediate. Meanwhile, plant biomass, branch biomass, branch number, average branch length and branch position inserted at the stem were found to be significantly different between the species studied. For M. oguraense Miki subsp. yangtzense Wang, fragments regenerated larger branch biomass, more lateral branches and longer branches, while fragments produced larger total plant biomass for M. spicatum L., indicating that different regenerative strategies of fragments occurred between the two species. Moreover, apical fragment of M. spicatum L. regenerated lateral branches at the bottom of the stem, while all fragments of M. oguraense Miki subsp. yangtzense Wang produced lateral branches at the top of stem. The present data confirmed the previous conclusion that larger fragments had higher regeneration abilities than smaller fragments and the regeneration potential of fragments with an apical tip was greater than fragments without an apical tip. Our study implied that the regrowth patterns differ between the studied species. M. spicatum L. was prone to increase investment in plant biomass while M. oguraense Miki subsp. yangtzense Wang was prone to invest more to reproduction of lateral branches. This suggested that regeneration performances of fragments of the studied macrophytes were species-specific and fragment trait-dependent, and the results might provide reference for biodiversity conservation and wetland vegetation management.
  • [1]
    Kimbel J C. Factors influencing potential intralake colonizationby Myriophyllum spicatum L. [J]. Aquatic Botany, 1982,14(4): 295-307
    [2]
    Smith C S, Barko J W. Ecology of Eurasian watermilfoil [J].Journal of Aquatic Plant Management, 1990, 28(2): 55-64
    [3]
    Madsen J D, Smith D H. Vegetative of Eurasian watermilfoilcolonies [J]. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management, 1997,35(2): 63-68
    [4]
    Nilsson C. Distribution of stream-edge vegetation along agradient of current velocity [J]. Journal of Ecology, 1987,75(2): 513-522
    [5]
    Sabol B M. Environmental effects of aquatic dispersal ofchopped Hydrilla [J]. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management,1987, 25(1): 19-23
    [6]
    Bornette G, Amoros C. Disturbance regimes and vegetationdynamics: role of floods in riverine wetlands [J]. Journal ofVegetation Science, 1996, 7(5): 615-622
    [7]
    Santamaría L. Why most aquatic plants are widely distributed?Dispersal, clonal growth and small-scale heterogeneity[J]. Acta Oecologia, 2002, 23(3): 137-157
    [8]
    Combroux I C S, Bornette G. Propagule banks and regenerativestrategies of aquatic plants [J]. Journal of VegetationScience, 2004, 15(1): 13-20
    [9]
    Madsen J D, Eichler L W, Boylen C W. Vegetative spread ofEurasian watermilfoil in Lake George, New York [J]. Journalof Aquatic Plant Management, 1988, 26(2): 47-50
    [10]
    Campbell M L. Recruitment and colonization of vegetativefragments of Posidonia australis and Posidonia coriacea [J].Aquatic Botany, 2003, 76(2): 175-184
    [11]
    Grace J B, Wetzel R G. The production biology of Eurasianwatermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum L.): a review [J].Journal of Aquatic Plant Management, 1978, 16(1): 1-11
    [12]
    Aiken S G, Newroth P R, Wile I. The biology of Canadianweeds: 34. Myriophyllum spicatum L. [J]. Canadian Journalof Plant Science, 1979, 59(1): 201-215
    [13]
    Barrat-Segretain M H, Bornette G, Hering-Vilas-B?as A.Comparative abilities of vegetative regeneration amongaquatic plants growing in disturbed habitats [J]. AquaticBotany, 1998, 60(3): 201-211
    [14]
    Wu Z, Zuo J, Ma J, et al. Establishing submersed macrophytesvia sinking and colonization of shoot fragmentsclipped off manually [J]. Wuhan University Journal of NaturalSciences, 2007, 12(3): 553-557
    [15]
    Jiang J, An S, Zhou C, et al. Fragment propagation and colonizationability enhanced and varied at node level after escapingfrom apical dominance in submerged macrophytes [J].Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2009, 51(3): 308-315
    [16]
    Riis T, Madsen T V, Sennels R S H. Regeneration, colonizationand growth rates of all fragments in four commonstream plants [J]. Aquatic Botany, 2009, 90(2): 209-212
    [17]
    Cline M G. Apical dominance [J]. Botanical Review, 1991,57(4): 318-358
    [18]
    De Vries D P, Dubois L A M. Variation in the shoot productionof “Sonia” cut rose plants, originating from graftingscions of different nodal positions [J]. Gartenbauwissenschaft,1992, 57(1): 64-68
    [19]
    Chen H D. Life history, biomass and cut-branch propagationof Potamogeton crispus L. [J]. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica,1985, 9(1): 29-32 [陈洪达. 菹草的生活史、生物量和断枝的无性繁殖. 水生生物学报, 1985, 9(1): 29-32]
    [20]
    Gao Y, Yu X M, Liu J, et al. Production of adventitious rootsand buds on fragments of Myriophyllum spicatum L. [J].Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica, 2007, 31(5): 726-730 [高莹,余小敏, 刘杰, 等. 狐尾藻断枝上不定根与芽发生的初步探究. 水生生物学报, 2007, 31(5): 726-730]
    [21]
    Ge X G, Wang G X, Lu Y C. Study on regeneration ability ofsegment in four submerged macrophytes [J]. Journal of Hydroecology,2009, 2(4): 23-28 [葛绪广, 王国祥, 陆贻超 4 种沉水植物断枝再生能力研究. 水生态学杂志, 2009,2(4): 23-28]
    [22]
    Ma J M, Hu L W, Hu Q R, et al. Regeneration of fragmentsof Elodea nuttallii and Hydrilla verticillata [J]. Acta HydrobiologicaSinica, 2010, 34(3): 525-532 [马剑敏, 胡灵卫,胡倩如, 等. 伊乐藻和黑藻断枝根和芽的发生及生长研究.水生生物学报, 2010, 34(3): 525-532]
    [23]
    Yu D, Wang D, Li Z Y, et al. Taxonomic revision of the genusMyriophyllum (Haloragaceae) in China [J]. Rhodora,2002, 104(920): 396-421
    [24]
    Wang D, Yu D. A new subspecies of Myriophyllum oguraense(Haloragaceae) from China [J]. Annales BotaniciFennici, 2007, 44(3): 227-230
    [25]
    Sculthorpe C D. The Biology of Aquatic Vascular Plants [M].London: Edward Arnold. 1967, 610
    [26]
    Barrat-Segretain M H. Strategies of reproduction, dispersionand competition in river plants: a review [J]. Vegetation,1996, 123(1): 12-37
    [27]
    Mielecki M, Peiczynska E. The influence of fragmentationon the growth of Elodea canadensis Michx. in different lightconditions [J]. Polish Journal of Ecology, 2005, 53(2):155-164
    [28]
    Southwood T R E. Tactics, Strategies and templates [J].Oikos, 1988, 52(1): 3-18
    [29]
    Barrat-Segretain M H, Henry C P, Bornette G. Regenerationand colonization of aquatic plant fragments in relation to thedisturbance frequency of their habitats [J]. Archiv für Hydrobiologie,1999, 145(1): 111-145

Catalog

    Article views (1516) PDF downloads (662) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return