DONG Shi-Rui, KONG Jie, ZHANG Tian-Shi, MENG Xian-Hong, WANG Ru-Cai. MICROSATELLITE MARKERS SIMULATION AND APPLICATION FOR PARENTAGE DETERMINATION ON FENNEROPENAEUS CHINENSIS[J]. ACTA HYDROBIOLOGICA SINICA, 2008, 32(1): 96-101.
Citation: DONG Shi-Rui, KONG Jie, ZHANG Tian-Shi, MENG Xian-Hong, WANG Ru-Cai. MICROSATELLITE MARKERS SIMULATION AND APPLICATION FOR PARENTAGE DETERMINATION ON FENNEROPENAEUS CHINENSIS[J]. ACTA HYDROBIOLOGICA SINICA, 2008, 32(1): 96-101.

MICROSATELLITE MARKERS SIMULATION AND APPLICATION FOR PARENTAGE DETERMINATION ON FENNEROPENAEUS CHINENSIS

  • Received Date: February 27, 2006
  • Rev Recd Date: September 17, 2006
  • Published Date: January 24, 2008
  • This study was initiated to assess the feasibility of parentage determination in aquaculture populations for Chineseshrimp ( Fenneropenaeus chinensis). Under different scenarios both simulation and reality, microsatellite markers were used to as-sign parentage to offspring. Simulations based on allele frequency data fromthe population of Chinese shrimp demonstrated that atleast 4 loci were required to assign over 95 % of progeny. When marker data fromfive loci were combined, the assignment success of progeny to their true parental couple increased to 9219 % in parentage identification with known parental and filial information. Out of 215 offspring, 9017 % was assigned to their parental pairs exclusively in mixed families groups. This studyshowed that the pedigree of progeny in mixed families could be satisfactorily determined using as few as five microsatellite markerseven though the shrimp could have originated from 30 possible pairs. Discrepancies between the simulations and real data setswere considered to be largely due to the mismatches caused by scoring errors at microsatellite loci. Analysis for the value of LODwould reduce the error occurred in parentage determination on Chinese shrimp. Based on these results, it was concluded that theuse of a number of microsatellite markers represented a realistic and effective alternative to physical tagging in a selection programand it allowed the identification of parental effects on offspring performances from the early life stages.
  • [1]
    Deng J Y, Zhuang ZM. The cause of recruitment variation of Penaeuschinensis in the Bohai Sea [J]. Journal of Fishery Sciences of China,2000, 7(4): 125-128 [邓景耀, 庄志猛. 渤海对虾补充量变动的分析及对策研究. 中国水产科学, 2001,7(4):125-128]
    [2]
    Zhuang Z M, Shi T, Kong J, et al. Genetic diversity in Penaeuschinensis shrimp as revealed by RAPD technique [J]. Progress inNatural Science, 2001, 11(6): 432-438
    [3]
    Op Reilly P T, Wright J M. The evolving technology of DNA finger2printing and its application to fisheries and aquaculture [J]. Journalof Fish Biology, 1995, 47: 29-55
    [4]
    Ferguson MM, Danzmann R G. Role of genetic markers in fisheriesand aquaculture: useful tools or stamp collecting [J] ? Can. J.Fish. Aquat. Sci., 1998, 55: 1553-1563
    [5]
    Herbinger C M, Doyle R W, Pitman E R, et al. DNA fingerprintbased analysis of parental and maternal effects on offspring growth andsurvival in communally reared rainbow trout [J]. Aquaculture, 1995,137: 245-256
    [6]
    Blouin M S, Parsons M, Lacaille V L S. Use of microsatellite loci toclassify individuals by relatedness [J]. Mol. Ecol., 1996, 3:393-401
    [7]
    O’Reilly P T, Herbinger C, Wright J M. Analysis of parentage de2termination in Atlantic salmon ( Salmo salar) using microsatellites[J]. Anim. Genet., 1998, 29: 363-370
    [9]
    Stephen S M, Vicki W, Gerard P D, et al. The development andapplication of genetic markers for the Kuruma prawn Penaeus japoni2cus [J]. Aquaculture, 1999, 173: 19-32
    [10]
    Dena R J, Nigel P P, Peter J, et al. Parentage determination of Ku2ruma shrimp Penaeus ( Marsupenaeus) japonicus using microsatellitemarkers (Bate) [J]. Aquaculture, 2004, 235: 237-247
    [11]
    Takuma S, Minoru I, Hideshi M, et al. Inheritance mode of mi2crosatellite DNA markers and their use for kinship estimation in Kuruma prawn Penaeus japonicus [J]. Fisheries Science, 2002, 68:299-305
    [12]
    Jackson T R, Martin2Robichaud D J, Reith M E. Application ofDNA markers to the management of Atlantic halibut ( Hippoglossushippoglossus) broodstock [J]. Aquaculture, 2003, 220:245-259
    [13]
    Motoyuki H, Masashi S. Efficient detection of parentage in a culturedJapanese flounder Paralichthys olivaceus using microsatellite DNAmarker [J]. Aquaculture, 2003, 217: 107-114
    [14]
    Sekino M, Sugaya T, Hara M, et al. Relatedness inferred from microsatellite genotypes as a tool for broodstock management of Japaneseflounder Paralichthys olivaceus [J]. Aquaculture, 2004, 233: 163-172
    [15]
    Marc V, Martin K, Stephane M, et al. Heritability estimates forgrowth2Related traits using microsatellite parentage assignment in ju2venile common carp ( Cyprinus carpio L. ) [J]. Aquaculture, 2004,235: 223-236
    [16]
    McDonald GJ, Danzmann R G, Ferguson M M. Relatedness deter2mination in the absence of pedigree information in three culturedstains of rainbow trout ( Oncorhynchus mykiss ) [J]. Aquaculture,2004, 233: 65-78
    [17]
    Jaime C, Carmen B, Pablo P, et al. Potential sources of error inparentage assessment of terbot ( Scophthalmus maximus ) using mi2crosatellite loci [J]. Aquaculture, 2004, 242: 119-135
    [18]
    Liu P, Kong J, Shi T, et al. RAPD analysis of wild stock of penaeidshrimp ( Penaeus chinensis) in the Chinaps coastal waters of Huanghaiand Bohai Seas [J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2000, 22(5): 89-93 [刘萍,孔杰,石拓, 等. 中国对虾黄、渤海沿岸地理群的RAPD 分析. 海洋学报,2000,22(5): 89-93]
    [19]
    Liu P, Meng X H, Kong J, et al. Polymorphism of microsatellite DNA in penaeid shrimp ( Penaeus chinensis) [J]. Progress in Natu2ral Science, 2004, 14 (3): 333-338 [刘萍, 孟宪红, 孔杰, 等.中国对虾微卫星DNA 多态性分析. 自然科学进展, 2004, 14(3): 333-338]
    [20]
    Zhang T S, Wang Q Y, Liu P, et al. Genetic diversity analysis onselected populations of shrimp Fenneropenaeus chinensis by microsatellites [J]. Oceanoligia et Limnologia Sinica, 2005, 36 (1):72-80 [张天时,王清印,刘萍, 等. 中国对虾( Fenneropenaeuschinensis) 人工选育群体不同世代的微卫星分析. 海洋与湖沼,2005, 36 (1): 72-80]
    [21]
    Wilson A J, Ferguson M M. Molecular pedigree analysis in naturalpopulations of fishes: approaches, applications, and practical consid2erations [J]. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 2002, 59: 1696-1707
    [22]
    Ashie T N, Daniel GB, Edward P C. Parentage and relatedness determination in farmed Atlantic salmon ( Salmo salar ) using microsatellite markers [J]. Aquaculture, 2000, 182: 73-83
    [23]
    Estoup A, Gharbi K, San C M, et al. Parentage assignment usingmicrosatellites in turbot ( Scophthalmus maximus) and rainbow trout( Oncorhynchus mykiss) hatchery populations [J]. Can. J. Fish.Aqut. Sci., 1998, 55: 715-725
    [24]
    Sugaya T, Ikeda M, Mori H, Taniguchi N. Inheritance mode of microsatellite DNA markers and their use for kinship estimation in Kuru2ma prawn Penaeus japonicus [J]. Fish. Sci., 2002, 68: 299-305
    [25]
    Jones A G, Stockwell C A, Walker D, et al. The molecular basis ofa mirosatellite null allele from the white sands pupfish [J]. J.Hered., 1998, 89: 339-342
    [26]
    Banks M A, Blouin M S, Baldwin B A, et al. Isolation and inheritance of novel microsatellites in Chinook salmon ( Oncorhynchustachawytscha) [J]. J. Hered., 1999, 90: 281-288
    [27]
    Alderson GW, Gibbs HL, Sealy S G. Parentage and kinship studiesin an obligate brood parasitic bide, the brown-headed cowbird( Molothrus ater ), using microsatellite DNA markers [J]. J.Hered., 1999, 90: 182-190
    [28]
    Marshall T C, Slate J, Kruuk L EB, et al. Statistical confidence forlikelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations [J]. Mol.Ecol., 1998, 7: 639-655
    [29]
    O’Reilly P T, Herbinger C, Wright J M. Analysis of parentage determination in Atlantic salmon ( Salmo salar) using microsatellites[J]. Anim. Genet., 1998, 29: 363-370

Catalog

    Article views (925) PDF downloads (581) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return