狐尾藻断枝上不定根与芽发生的初步研究

高莹, 余小敏, 刘杰, 杨万年, 李敦海, 刘永定

高莹, 余小敏, 刘杰, 杨万年, 李敦海, 刘永定. 狐尾藻断枝上不定根与芽发生的初步研究[J]. 水生生物学报, 2007, 31(5): 726-730.
引用本文: 高莹, 余小敏, 刘杰, 杨万年, 李敦海, 刘永定. 狐尾藻断枝上不定根与芽发生的初步研究[J]. 水生生物学报, 2007, 31(5): 726-730.
GAO Ying, YU Xiao-Min, LIU Jie, YANG Wan-Nian, LI Dun-Hai, LIU Yong-Ding. PRODUCTION OF ADVENTITIOUS ROOTS AND BUDS ON FRAGMENTS OF MYRIOPHYLLU M SPICATUM L.[J]. ACTA HYDROBIOLOGICA SINICA, 2007, 31(5): 726-730.
Citation: GAO Ying, YU Xiao-Min, LIU Jie, YANG Wan-Nian, LI Dun-Hai, LIU Yong-Ding. PRODUCTION OF ADVENTITIOUS ROOTS AND BUDS ON FRAGMENTS OF MYRIOPHYLLU M SPICATUM L.[J]. ACTA HYDROBIOLOGICA SINICA, 2007, 31(5): 726-730.

狐尾藻断枝上不定根与芽发生的初步研究

基金项目: 

国家863计划项目(2002AA601013)资助

PRODUCTION OF ADVENTITIOUS ROOTS AND BUDS ON FRAGMENTS OF MYRIOPHYLLU M SPICATUM L.

  • 摘要: 本文比较研究了不同节位和不同长度狐尾藻断枝的不定根和芽的发生时间及其形成幼苗的频率(本文中的幼苗指最终形成了不定根和芽的断枝)。结果表明:在狐尾藻顶芽以下叶已完全展开的茎段部分,不定根和芽的发生时间呈现出随着节位下降而逐渐缩短的趋势,而幼苗形成频率呈现出随着节位下降而增高的趋势;断枝的长度(用断枝所含的茎节数表示)对不定根和芽的发生时间及幼苗形成频率也有明显的影响。断枝长度增加,不定根和芽的发生时间缩短,形成幼苗的频率升高。另外与抛掷方式相比,扦插延长多节断枝的不定根和芽形成时间,但提高幼苗的形成频率。这些研究结果为制定水体生态系统中狐尾藻的恢复和管理措施提供了参考。
    Abstract: The time for adventitious roots and buds formation and the frequency of plantlet production fromwatermilfoil fragments were compared among fragments from different node?positions or with different lengths.The results demonstrated that the time for adventitious roots and buds formation was gradually shortened with the descending of node positions from the top down while the frequency of plantlet formation increased.The length of fragments (expressed by the amount of nodes on fragments) also has some effects on the time of root and bud formation as well as frequency of plantlet formation. Multi?node fragments produced adventious roots and buds in a shorter time than mono-node fragments and developed to plantlets with a higher frequency. Compared with throwing method which means throwing the cuttings into thewater randomlyl, cuttage method delayed the formation of adventitious roots and buds from the multi?node fragments, but increased the frequency of plantlet formation.
  • [1]

    Zhan C W, Yu D, Wu Z H, et al.The community ecology of aquaticplant in the water land ecotone of Liangzi Lake [J]. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2001, 25(5): 57-80[詹存卫, 于丹, 吴中华,等. 梁子湖水陆交错区水生植物群落生态学研究. 植物生态学报, 2001, 25(5): 57-80]

    [2]

    Chen Z Y, Lei Z X, Zhou J, et al.Monthly quantitative and biomassdynamics of six submerged macrophytes populations in Liangzi Lake[J]. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica, 2000,24(6): 58-88[陈中义, 雷泽湘, 周进, 等. 梁子湖六种沉水植物种群数量和生物量周年动态.水生生物学报, 2000,24(6): 58-88]

    [3]

    Li W, Cheng Y. Quantitative analysis on the main submerged com munities inHongHu Lake.Ceratophyllum demersun+ Potanogetoncrispus + Myriophyllum spicatum community [J]. ActaHydrobiologica Sinica,2000, 24(1):3-5[李伟, 程玉. 洪湖主要沉水植物群落的定量分析. 金鱼藻+ 菹草+ 穗花狐尾藻群落. 水生生物学报, 2000, 24(1): 3-5]

    [4]

    Yang L Y, Liang H T, Hu W P, et al.The study on natural restoration of aquatic vegetation in the northern lakeside, Lake Taihu [J].Journal of Lake Sciences, 2002, 14(1): 6-6[杨龙元, 梁海棠,胡维平, 等. 太湖北部滨岸区水生植被自然修复观测研究.湖泊科学, 2002, 14(1): 6-6]5期高莹等: 狐尾藻断枝上不定根与芽发生的初步研究729

    [5]

    Ma J M, Yan G A, Luo Y P, et al. The aquatic vegetation restoratinand its structure imrovement and water qualitydynamics in the controlled ecosystem in East Lake (Wuhan) [J]. J of Lake Sciences,1997, 9(4): 35-63[马剑敏, 严国安, 罗岳平, 等. 武汉东湖受控生态系统中水生植被恢复结构优化及水质动态. 湖泊科学, 1997, 9(4): 35-63]

    [6]

    Zhang X M, Chen J, Yang SH. Study on restoration of aquatic vegetation in Dianchi Lake [J]. Journal of Yunnan Environment,1998, 17(3): 3-0[张秀敏, 陈娟, 杨树华. 滇池水生植被恢复规划研究. 云南环境科学, 1998, 17(3): 3-0]

    [7]

    Smith C S, Barko J W. Ecology of Eurasian watermilfoil [J]. JAquat Plant Manage, 1990, 28: 5-4

    [8]

    Chen Z Y, Lei Z X, Zhou J, et al. A preliminary study of winterseed bank of dominant submerged macrophytes in Lake Liangzi [J].ActaHydrobiologica Sinica, 2001, 25(2): 15-58[陈中义, 雷泽湘, 周进, 等. 梁子湖优势沉水植物冬季种子库的初步研究.水生生物学报, 2001, 25(2): 15-58]

    [9]

    Kimbel J C. Factors influencing potential intralake colonization by Myriophyllum spicatum L. [J].Aquat Bot, 1982, 14: 29-07

    [10]

    Cui X H, Xiong B H, Pu Y H, et al. Comparative study of regeneration and colonization ability in five submersed macrophytes [J]. ActaPhytoecologica Sinica, 2000, 24(4): 50-05[崔心红, 熊秉红,蒲云海, 等. 5种沉水植物无性繁殖和定居能力的比较研究.植物生态学报, 2000,24(4): 50-05]

    [11]

    Grace J B, Wetzel R G. The production biology of Eurasianwatermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum L.): a review [J]. J Aquat Plant Manage,1978, 16: 1

    [12]

    Smith DH, Madsen J D, Dickson K L, et al. Nutrient effects on autofragmentation of Myriophyllum spicatum[J]. Aquatic Botany, 2002,74: 1-17

    [13]

    Su W H, Zhang G F, Zhang Y S, et al.The photosynthetica characteristics of five submerged aquatic plants [J]. Acta HydrobiologicaSinica, 2004,28(42): 39-95[苏文华, 张光飞, 张云孙, 等. 5种沉水植物的光合特征. 水生生物学报, 2004, 28(42): 391395]

    [14]

    Lian G H, Zhang S Z. Artificial vegetative reproduction and plantation technique for Elodea nuttallii and six other species of submergedplants [J]. J Lake Sciences,1996, 8(suppl): 1-6[连光华, 张圣照. 伊乐藻等水生高等植物的快速营养繁殖技术和培养方法. 湖泊科学, 1996,8(增刊): 1-6]

    [15]

    Aiken S G, Newroth P R, Wile I. The biology of Canadian Weeds. 34.Myriophyllum s picatum L.[J]. Can J Plant Sci,1979, 59: 21-15

计量
  • 文章访问数:  974
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量:  486
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2005-05-19
  • 修回日期:  2006-09-02
  • 发布日期:  2007-09-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回