长臀鮠的AFLP分析

程飞, 谢松光, 叶卫, 叶富良

程飞, 谢松光, 叶卫, 叶富良. 长臀鮠的AFLP分析[J]. 水生生物学报, 2009, 33(3): 539-545.
引用本文: 程飞, 谢松光, 叶卫, 叶富良. 长臀鮠的AFLP分析[J]. 水生生物学报, 2009, 33(3): 539-545.
CHENG Fei, XIE SongGuang, YE Wei, YE FuLiang. GENETIC ANALYSIS OF CRANOGLANIS BOUDERIUS BY MOLECULAR MARKER AFLP[J]. ACTA HYDROBIOLOGICA SINICA, 2009, 33(3): 539-545.
Citation: CHENG Fei, XIE SongGuang, YE Wei, YE FuLiang. GENETIC ANALYSIS OF CRANOGLANIS BOUDERIUS BY MOLECULAR MARKER AFLP[J]. ACTA HYDROBIOLOGICA SINICA, 2009, 33(3): 539-545.

长臀鮠的AFLP分析

基金项目: 

广东省科技重大专项(2005A20105001)资助

GENETIC ANALYSIS OF CRANOGLANIS BOUDERIUS BY MOLECULAR MARKER AFLP

  • 摘要: 采用AFLP分子标记技术对珠江长臀和海南长臀共60个个体(每个群体30个)进行了遗传多样性研究。选取的18对引物组合均能扩增出清晰、可重复的扩增产物,扩增带型差异明显。两个群体均表现出较高的多态位点比例和特异性条带数。群体内个体间的遗传相似度(平均值)珠江长臀种群为0.9462±0.0237,海南长臀为0.9465±0.0226,海南长臀比珠江长臀略高。群体间的遗传相似度是0.9367±0.0231,小于两个群体内的遗传相似度,两群体的遗传距离是0.0634±0.0230。根据遗传相似度绘制了UPGMA聚类图。研究结果表明:珠江长臀和海南长臀间的遗传差异属于种内差异,两者同属一个有效种。
    Abstract: The genus Cranoglanis is a group of fish only distributed in East Asia. They live in the drainages of Guangdong, Guangxi,Yunnan and Haiuan Province, China, and the Red River drainage in northern Vietnam. At present,the wild re-source of Cranoglanis bouderius has decreased rapidly because of excess utilized, and there are still some arguments on the validity of the species of the genus Cranoglanis. In order to determining the genetic structure and the validity of the spe-cies, AFLP technique was used to analyze the genetic diversity of Pearl River C. bouderias and Hainan C. bouderius. Sixty individuals from the two populations (thirty individuals per population) were analyzed by using eighteen primer combina-tions. The amplified bands of the eighteen primer combinations were in focus and repeated. The models of amplified band had distinct difference. The result of study showed that both populations had high percent of polymorphic loci and number of special bands. The genetic similarities was 0.9462?.0237 and 0.9465?.0226 within the population of Pearl River C. bouderius and the population of Hainan C. bouderius respectively, and was 0.9367?.0231 between Pearl River C. bouderius and Hainan C. bouderius, the genetic similarities between populations was lower than that within population. The genetic distance was 0.0634?.0230 between Pearl River C. bouderius and Hainan C. bouderius. The analyzed of phylo-genetic trees of two populations suggested that individuals of the same population combined together at first, and then two populations combined. The preliminary analysis result indicates that there are no prominent differences between genetic structure of Pearl River C. bouderius and Hainan C. bouderius, so they should be considered as one species.
  • [1]

    Liu C X,Peng Z G,He S P.Study on species classification for Genus cranoglnis peters with the method of morphometrics[J].Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica,2005,29 (5):507-512[刘彩霞,彭作刚,何舜平.长臀鮠属鱼类多变量形态分析及物种有效性研究.水生生物学报,2005,29(5):507-512]

    [2]

    Zhou L B,Liu X C,Ye W,et al.In vitro studies of effects of 17β estratiol and methyltestosterone on gonodotropin secretion by pituitary of helmet catfish (Cranoglanis bouderius)[J].Journal of Fishery Sciences of China,2005,12 (2):113-118[周立斌,刘晓春,叶卫,等.17β-雌二醇和甲基睾酮对离体长臀鮠脑垂体促性腺激素分泌的影响.中国水产科学,2005,12(2):113-118]

    [3]

    Yue P Q,Chen Y Y.Entreated animals red books of China[M].Beijing:Science Press.1998,13-19[乐佩琦,陈宜瑜.中国濒危动物红皮书--鱼类.北京:科学出版社.1998,13-19]

    [4]

    Chen Q H,Xiao T Y,Liu Z.Utilization of AFLP marking technology in aquatic animal research[J].Journal of Dalian Fisheries University,2005,20 (1):69-72[陈清华,肖调义,刘臻.AFLP技术在水产动物研究中的应用.大连水产学院学报,2005,20(1):69-72]

    [5]

    Xu S B,Tao Y F,Yang Z Q,et al.Asimpleand rapid methods used for silver staining and gel preservation[J]. Hereditas,2002,24(3):335-336[许绍斌,陶玉芬,杨昭庆,等.2002.简单快速的DNA银染和胶保存方法.遗传,2002,24(3):335-336]

    [6]

    Lynch M.The similarity index and DNA fingerprinting[J].Mol-Biol Evol,1990,7:478-'484

    [7]

    Li S,Zhao G F.AFLP molecular marker and its application[J].Acta Bot.Boreal Occident.Sin,2003,23 (5):830-836[李珊,赵桂芳.AFLP分子标记及其应用.西北植物学报,2003,23(5):830-836]

    [8]

    Liang Z Y,Shi J Q,Wei H,et al.AFLP analysis of 10 strains of mice[J].Acta Academic Medicinae Militaris Tertioe,2003,25(2):155-159[梁智勇,史景泉,魏泓,等.10个品系小鼠的AFLP分析.第三军医大学学报,2003,25(2):155-159]

    [9]

    Zhang J B,Huang L M.Analyses of genetic diversity of Lutijanus argentimaculatus by AFLP molecular technique[J].Journal of Tropical Oceanography,2004,23(5):50-55[张俊彬,黄良民.紫红笛鲷遗传多样性的AFLP分析.热带海洋学报,2004,23(5):50-55]

    [10]

    Liu B Q,Dnng W Q,Wang Y J,et al.Identication of germ plasm in Psoudosciaena crocea Tai Chu race by AFLP[J].Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica,2005,29(4):413-416[刘必谦,董闻琦,王亚军,等.岱衢族大黄鱼种质的AFLP分析.水生生物学报,2005,29(4):413-416]

    [11]

    Wang Z,Jayasankar P,Khoo S K,et al.AFLP fingerprinting reveals genetic variability in common carp stocks from Indonesia[J].Asian Fisheries Science,2000,13:139-147

    [12]

    Koller O.Fish van der Insel Hainan[J].Annalen des Naturhis.torisches Museums in Wien,1927,41:25-49

    [13]

    Myers G S.On the fishes described by Koller from Hainan in 1926 and 1927[J].Lingnan Science Journal,1931,10:255-262

    [14]

    Chu X L,Chen Y R.The fishes of Yunnan,China.Part Ⅱ[M].Beijing:Science Press.1999,313

    [15]

    Ng H H.Crannglanis henrici (Vaillant,1893),a valid species of Cranoglanidid catfish from Indochina (Teleostei,Cranoglanididae).[J].Zoosystema,2000,22 (4):847-852

    [16]

    Thorp J P.The molecular dock hypothesis:Biochemical evolution,genetic differentiation,and systematic[J].Annual Review of Ecology Systematics,1982,13(1):139-168

计量
  • 文章访问数:  921
  • HTML全文浏览量:  4
  • PDF下载量:  598
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2007-09-29
  • 修回日期:  2008-12-10
  • 发布日期:  2009-05-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回