嘉陵江下游硅藻群落结构及物种多样性研究

邓洪平, 陈锋, 王明书, 刘长坤

邓洪平, 陈锋, 王明书, 刘长坤. 嘉陵江下游硅藻群落结构及物种多样性研究[J]. 水生生物学报, 2010, 34(2): 330-335.
引用本文: 邓洪平, 陈锋, 王明书, 刘长坤. 嘉陵江下游硅藻群落结构及物种多样性研究[J]. 水生生物学报, 2010, 34(2): 330-335.
DENG Hong-Ping, CHEN Feng, WANG Ming-Shu, LIU Chang-Kun. COMMUNITY STRUCTURE AND SPECIES DIVERSITY OF DIATOM IN DOWNSTREAM OF JIALING RIVER[J]. ACTA HYDROBIOLOGICA SINICA, 2010, 34(2): 330-335.
Citation: DENG Hong-Ping, CHEN Feng, WANG Ming-Shu, LIU Chang-Kun. COMMUNITY STRUCTURE AND SPECIES DIVERSITY OF DIATOM IN DOWNSTREAM OF JIALING RIVER[J]. ACTA HYDROBIOLOGICA SINICA, 2010, 34(2): 330-335.

嘉陵江下游硅藻群落结构及物种多样性研究

基金项目: 

重庆市自然科学基金(CSTC,2008BB5256)

国家自然科技资源平台项目(2005DKA21403)资助

COMMUNITY STRUCTURE AND SPECIES DIVERSITY OF DIATOM IN DOWNSTREAM OF JIALING RIVER

  • 摘要: 于2006 年11 月, 2007 年2 月、5 月和8 月, 分别采集嘉陵江下游8 个采样点藻类样品, 分析其硅藻群落结构及物种多样性, 并利用物种多样性指数及硅藻商等对水质进行了生物学评价。结果表明: (1)共发现89种硅藻, 硅藻细胞密度变幅为0.57×104—4.51×104 ind/L, 总平均2.31×104 ind/L; 多样性指数值变幅为0.72—3.12, 总平均2.20; 均匀度指数值变幅为0.15—0.52, 总平均0.36; 硅藻商变幅为0.66—9.48, 总平均3.24。(2)硅藻群落结构呈现出季节和水平分布上的变化。在季节变化上, 物种丰富度、细胞密度及多样性指数等以温度较低的春(5 月)、秋(11 月)两季最高, 而以夏季(8 月)最低。在水平分布上, 从上游到下游, 硅藻群落结构呈现出物种丰富度、多样性指数值逐渐减小, 而细胞密度和硅藻商逐渐增加的趋势。(3)嘉陵江下游水质总体为β-中污水体。其中位于城市上游的云门、沙溪、温塘峡、井口水质较好, 为微污或β-中污水体, 而位于城区及下游的合川、毛背沱、磁器口和朝天门水质较差, 为α-中污或污染水体。
    Abstract: To study the community structure and species diversity of diatom in downstream of Jialing River, 8 diatom samples were collected according to normal methods, in October, 2006, February, May, and December, 2007, respectively. Diatom species numbers, cell density, diversity index, evenness index and diatom quotient were studied as well as water quality was analysed according to diversity index and diatom quotient. The results showed that: (1) 89 taxa, which belonged to 2 class, 11 family and 22 genera, were observed (including variety and form). Pennatae diatom species richness were higher than that of centriate diatom; The cell densities of diatom was in the range of 0.57×104—4.51×104 ind/L with the mean value of 2.3×104ind/L; The diversity index was in the range of 0.72—3.12 with the mean value of 2.20; The evenness index was in the range of 0.15—0.52 with the mean value of 0.36; The diatom quotient was in the range of 0.66—9.48 with the mean value of 3.24. Compared with Daning River, Han River, Yangtze River, and so on, diatom community structure in downstream of Jialing River took on higher species richness and diversity and lower cell density. (2) The diatom community structure took on noticeable seasonal and horizontal distribution distinction. To seasonal change, Spring (Feb., 2008) and Autumn (May, 2008) had higher species richness, cell densities, diversity indices than those in Summer (Aug., 2008). To horizontal distribution change, from upstream to downstream, the diatom species richness and diversity indices declined gradually, however, cell densities and diatom quotient increased gradually. (3) The water quality in downstream of Jialing River belonged to β-mesosaprobic Zone totally. The water quality of the sampling sites in upstream city was better than those in downstream city. The water quality of YM, SX, WTX and JK was better, which belonged to β-mesosaprobic Zone or Oligosaprobid Zone; Those of HC, MBT, CQK and CTM belonged to α-mesosaprobic Zone or Polysaprobic Zone.
  • [1]

    Tian H J, Shu W Q, Zhang X K, et al. Organic pollutants insource water in Jialing River and Yangtze River (Chongqingsection) [J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin,2003, 12(2): 118—123 [田怀军, 舒为群, 张学奎, 等.长江、嘉陵江(重庆段)源水有机污染物研究. 长江流域资源与环境, 2003, 12(2): 118—123].

    [2]

    Wang M S. The community structure of the attached algae inlittle three Gorges of Jialing River during lower water periodsand their uses in water quality evaluation [J]. Journal ofSouthwest China Normal University, 1994, 19(3): 305—310[王明书. 嘉陵江小三峡附生藻类群落结构与水质评价.西南师范大学学报, 1994, 19(3): 305—310].

    [3]

    Zhang Z, Song L J, Guo W H. Phytoplankton communitycomposition and change in the confluence of ChangjiangRiver and Jialing River of Chongqing [J]. China EnvironmentalScience, 2005, 25(6): 695—699 [张智, 宋丽娟, 郭蔚华. 重庆长江嘉陵江交汇段浮游藻类组成及变化. 中国环境科学, 2005, 25(6): 695—699].

    [4]

    Ingrid J, Subodh S, Bed M D, et al. Diatoms as indicators ofstream quality in the Kathmandu Valley and Middle Hills ofNepal and India [J]. Freshwater Biology, 2003, 48: 2065—2084.

    [5]

    Gemma Urrea, Sergi Sabater. Epilithic diatom assemblagesand their relationship to environmental characteristics in anagricultural watershed (Guadiana River, SW Spain) [J].Ecological Indicators, 2009, 9: 693—703.

    [6]

    Chien J T. Some aspects of water quality in a polluted lowlandriver in relation to the intracellular chemical levels inplanktonic and epilithic diatoms [J]. Water Research, 2004,38: 1779—1790.

    [7]

    Tang T, Cai Q H and Liu J K. Using epilithic diatom communitiesto assess ecological condition of Xiangxi Riversystem [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2006,112: 347—361.

    [8]

    Ponader K C, Charles D F and Belton T J. Diatom-based TPand TN inference models and indices for monitoring nutrientenrichment of New Jersey streams [J]. Ecological Indicaters.2007, 7(1): 79—93.

    [9]

    Lin B Q, Xie S Q. Aquatic algae and detection for waterbody pollution [M]. Shenyang: Liaoning University PublishingHouse. 1988, 227—263 [林碧琴, 谢淑琦. 水生藻类与水体污染监测. 沈阳: 辽宁大学出版社. 1988, 227—263].

    [10]

    Hu H J, Wei Y X. The freshwater algae of China Systematics,Taxonomy and Ecology [M]. Beijing: Science Press. 2005[胡鸿钧, 魏印心. 中国淡水藻类系统分类及生态. 北京:科学出版社. 2005].

    [11]

    Krammer K. Cymbella. In: Lange-Bertalot H (Eds.), Diatomsof Europe. Diatoms of the European Inland Waters andComparable Habitats, vol. 3 [M]. A.R.G. Gantner VerlagK.G., Ruggell. 2002, 1—584.

    [12]

    Lange-Bertalot H. Navicula sensu stricto, 10 genera separatedfrom Navicula sensu lato, Frustulia. In: Lange-BertalotH (Eds.), Diatoms of Europe. Diatoms of the EuropeanInland Waters and Comparable Habitats, vol. 2 [M]. A.R.G.Gantner Verlag K.G., Ruggell. 2001, 1—526.

    [13]

    Cleve-Euler A. Die Diatomeen von Schweden und Finnland[M]. Kungliga Svenska: Vetenskaps-Akademiens Handlingar.1955.

    [14]

    Patrick R, Reimer C W. The Diatoms of the United States(exclusive of Alaska and Hawaii), Monographic series 13 ofAcademy of Natural Science of Philadephia1975, 1—207[M]. Philadephia, Pennsylvania: Sutter House Lititz. 1975,1—207.

    [15]

    Qi Y Z. Flora algarum sinicarum aquae dulcis, Tomus 4,Bacillariophyta-Centricae [M]. Beijing: Science Press. 1995,1—89 [齐雨藻. 中国淡水藻志(第四卷)硅藻门—中心纲.北京: 科学出版社. 1995, 1—89].

    [16]

    Qi Y Z, Li J Y, Xie S Q, et al. Flora algarum sinicarum aquaedulcis, Tomus 10, Bacillariophyta-Centricae [M]. Beijing:Science Press. 2004, 1—130 [齐雨藻, 李家英, 谢淑琦, 等.中国淡水藻志(第十卷)硅藻门—羽纹纲. 北京: 科学出版社. 2004, 1—130].

    [17]

    Shi Z X. Flora algarum sinicarum aquae dulcis, Tomus 12,Bacillariophyta-Ghophonemaceae [M]. Beijing: SciencePress. 2004, 1—82 [施之新. 中国淡水藻志(第十二卷)硅藻门—异极藻科. 北京: 科学出版社. 2004, 1—82].

    [18]

    Shen Y F, Zhang Z S, Gong X J. The new detection techniqueon minibiology [M]. Beijing: China Architecture IndustryPress. 1990, 134—136 [沈韫芬, 章宗涉, 龚循矩.微型生物监测新技术. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社. 1990,134—136].

    [19]

    Gorgio P A. Progressive changes in the structure and dynamicsof the phytoplankton community along a pollutiongradient in lowland river a multivariate approach [J]. Hydrobiology,1991, 214(3): 129—154.

    [20]

    Foot B. Algenkunde [M]. Shanghai: Shanghai ScienceTechnology Press. 1980, 370—373.

    [21]

    Reynolds C S. The ecology of freshwater phytoplankton [M].London: Cambridge University Press. 1984, 314—319.

    [22]

    Deng H P, Chen F, Wang M S. Community structure of diatomin Nanchong section of Jialing River and analysis of itswater environment [J]. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica, 2008,32(4): 586—591 [邓洪平, 陈锋, 王明书. 嘉陵江南充段硅藻群落结构及水环境分析. 水生生物学报, 2008, 32(4):586—591].

    [23]

    Zhou G J, Kuang Q J, Hu Z Y. Spring water blooms ofphytoplankton in Daning River and its nutrient limitation [J].Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2007,16(9): 628—633 [周广杰, 况琪军, 胡征宇. 大宁河春季浮游藻类水华及其营养限制. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007,16(9): 628—633].

    [24]

    Zhou G J, Kuang Q J, Hu Z Y, et al. Assessment of algaldiversity and water blooms prevention in four tributaries ofThree Gorges Reservoir [J]. China Environmental Science,2006, 26(3): 337—341 [周广杰, 况琪军, 胡征宇, 等. 三峡库区四条支流藻类多样性评价及“水华”防治. 中国环境科学, 2006, 26(3): 337—341].

计量
  • 文章访问数:  1037
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量:  713
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2008-09-21
  • 修回日期:  2009-08-22
  • 发布日期:  2010-03-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回